University of the Arts London

22.2k citations
1.8k papers ·

Impact in

  • Museology top 1%
    • Fashion and Cultural Textiles
  • Marketing top 5%
    • Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
    • Consumer Retail Behavior Studies

Papers in

University of the Arts London

1.4k papers receiving 20.2k citations

Peers

University of the Arts London
Comparison fields: 5 of 237
  • Museology 1.2k
  • Marketing 2.8k
  • Human-Computer Interaction 1.4k
  • Music 669
  • Urban Studies 1.0k
Replace University of Winchester with:
University of Winchester United Kingdom
York St John University United Kingdom
Edinburgh College United Kingdom
Royal College of Art United Kingdom
Liverpool Hope University United Kingdom
Bath Spa University United Kingdom
Amsterdam University of the Arts Netherlands
Buckinghamshire New University United Kingdom
Southampton Solent University United Kingdom
Education Scotland United Kingdom
University of the Arts London relative to University of Winchester United Kingdom University of Winchester's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
University of Winchester · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at University of the Arts London

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at University of the Arts London. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at University of the Arts London with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites University of the Arts London more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at University of the Arts London

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with University of the Arts London at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with University of the Arts London at the time of their publication.

About University of the Arts London

In recent decades, authors affiliated with University of the Arts London have published 1.8k papers, which have received a total of 22.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 215 papers in Museology, 220 papers in Visual Arts and Performing Arts, 162 papers in Human-Computer Interaction, 121 papers in Urban Studies and 50 papers in Conservation on the topics of Fashion and Cultural Textiles (142 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (109 papers), Cultural Industries and Urban Development (109 papers), Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (78 papers), Design Education and Practice (75 papers), Crafts, Textile, and Design (75 papers), Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (61 papers) and Art, Politics, and Modernism (56 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Museology (1.2k citations), Marketing (2.8k citations), Human-Computer Interaction (1.4k citations), Music (669 citations) and Urban Studies (1.0k citations). Authors at University of the Arts London collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and China and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Visual Art Practice, Journal of Design History, Fashion Theory, Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management and She ji. Some of University of the Arts London's most productive authors include Radan Martinec, Emmanuel Sirimal Silva, Hossein Hassani, Kent Grayson, Hannah Zeilig, Janet McDonnell, Paul Ekblom, Xu Huang, Beatriz García and Bethan Alexander.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact