Carl Hayden Bee Research Center
Impact in
- Insect Science top 2%
- Insect and Pesticide Research
- Bee Products Chemical Analysis
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
- Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences
-
- Plant and animal studies
Papers in
- Insect Science 386
- Insect and Pesticide Research 362
- Bee Products Chemical Analysis 43
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control 24
-
- Plant and animal studies 377
- Top scholars
- Martha GilliamGloria DeGrandi‐HoffmanStephen L. BuchmannKirk E. AndersonJustin O. SchmidtHayward G. SpanglerVanessa Corby‐HarrisPatrick W. Maes
- Journals
- Apidologie (63 papers)Journal of Apicultural Research (39 papers)Journal of Economic Entomology (20 papers)Annals of the Entomological Society of America (17 papers)Journal of Invertebrate Pathology (17 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaChina
In The Last Decade
Carl Hayden Bee Research Center
452 papers receiving 16.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 177
- Insect Science 12.4k
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 12.0k
- Genetics 9.5k
- Developmental Biology 154
- Plant Science 2.3k
Countries citing scholars working at Carl Hayden Bee Research Center
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Carl Hayden Bee Research Center. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Carl Hayden Bee Research Center with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Carl Hayden Bee Research Center more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Carl Hayden Bee Research Center
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Carl Hayden Bee Research Center at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Carl Hayden Bee Research Center at the time of their publication.
About Carl Hayden Bee Research Center
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Carl Hayden Bee Research Center have published 467 papers, which have received a total of 16.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 386 papers in Insect Science, 388 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 325 papers in Genetics, 2 papers in Horticulture and 58 papers in Plant Science on the topics of Plant and animal studies (377 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (362 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (320 papers), Bee Products Chemical Analysis (43 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (24 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (15 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (15 papers) and Plant Reproductive Biology (10 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Insect Science (12.4k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (12.0k citations), Genetics (9.5k citations), Developmental Biology (154 citations) and Plant Science (2.3k citations). Authors at Carl Hayden Bee Research Center collaborate with scholars in United States, Australia and China and have published in prestigious journals including Apidologie, Journal of Apicultural Research, Journal of Economic Entomology, Annals of the Entomological Society of America and Journal of Invertebrate Pathology. Some of Carl Hayden Bee Research Center's most productive authors include Martha Gilliam, Gloria DeGrandi‐Hoffman, Stephen L. Buchmann, Kirk E. Anderson, Justin O. Schmidt, Hayward G. Spangler, Vanessa Corby‐Harris, Patrick W. Maes, Yanping (Judy) Chen and Brendon M. Mott.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.