Taiwan Nurses Association

7.7k citations
679 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Taiwan Nurses Association

525 papers receiving 5.9k citations

Peers

Taiwan Nurses Association
Comparison fields: 5 of 209
  • Biological Psychiatry 150
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 194
  • Research and Theory 48
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 669
  • Gastroenterology 143
Replace Tzu Chi College of Technology with:
Tzu Chi College of Technology Taiwan
Yuan's General Hospital Taiwan
An-Nan Hospital Taiwan
Cheng Ching Hospital Taiwan
Pingtung Christian Hospital Taiwan
Kuang Tien General Hospital Taiwan
Third People's Hospital of Huzhou China
Luodong Poh-Ai Hospital Taiwan
Pingtung Hospital Taiwan
Alice Ho Miu Ling Nethersole Hospital China
Taiwan Nurses Association relative to Tzu Chi College of Technology Taiwan Tzu Chi College of Technology's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.9×
Tzu Chi College of Technology · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Taiwan Nurses Association

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Taiwan Nurses Association. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Taiwan Nurses Association with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Taiwan Nurses Association more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Taiwan Nurses Association

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Taiwan Nurses Association at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Taiwan Nurses Association at the time of their publication.

About Taiwan Nurses Association

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Taiwan Nurses Association have published 679 papers, which have received a total of 7.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 4 papers in Research and Theory, 21 papers in Gastroenterology, 48 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health, 10 papers in Geriatrics and Gerontology and 16 papers in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine on the topics of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research (18 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (14 papers), Sports Performance and Training (13 papers), Inflammatory Bowel Disease (11 papers), Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment (11 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (11 papers), Cytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research (10 papers) and Sleep and related disorders (10 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Biological Psychiatry (150 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (194 citations), Research and Theory (48 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (669 citations) and Gastroenterology (143 citations). Authors at Taiwan Nurses Association collaborate with scholars in Taiwan, United States and China and have published in prestigious journals including International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, PLoS ONE, Medicine, Scientific Reports and BMJ Open. Some of Taiwan Nurses Association's most productive authors include Chi‐Hsiang Chung, Wu‐Chien Chien, Nian‐Sheng Tzeng, Hsin‐An Chang, Yu Sun, Chun-Liang Chen, Tao‐Hsin Tung, Ming‐Jang Chiu, Yu‐Ching Chou and Yu‐Chen Kao.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact