Texas Parks and Wildlife Department

39.9k citations
2.1k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Texas Parks and Wildlife Department

1.9k papers receiving 38.7k citations

Peers

Texas Parks and Wildlife Department
Comparison fields: 5 of 215
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 14.8k
  • Aquatic Science 7.2k
  • Ecology 19.3k
  • Ecological Modeling 2.3k
  • Global and Planetary Change 10.0k
Replace Oklahoma Biological Survey with:
Oklahoma Biological Survey United States
Houston Museum of Natural Science United States
Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station United States
Louisiana Department of Natural Resources United States
Evolutionary Genomics (United States) United States
Colorado Parks and Wildlife United States
Illinois Department of Natural Resources United States
Dauphin Island Sea Lab United States
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission United States
Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center United States
Texas Parks and Wildlife Department relative to Oklahoma Biological Survey United States Oklahoma Biological Survey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.2×
Oklahoma Biological Survey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Texas Parks and Wildlife Department

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Texas Parks and Wildlife Department. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Texas Parks and Wildlife Department with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Texas Parks and Wildlife Department more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Texas Parks and Wildlife Department

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Texas Parks and Wildlife Department at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Texas Parks and Wildlife Department at the time of their publication.

About Texas Parks and Wildlife Department

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Texas Parks and Wildlife Department have published 2.1k papers, which have received a total of 39.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 876 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 368 papers in Aquatic Science, 1.1k papers in Ecology, 106 papers in Ecological Modeling and 501 papers in Global and Planetary Change on the topics of Fish Ecology and Management Studies (676 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (401 papers), Marine and fisheries research (279 papers), Fish Biology and Ecology Studies (258 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (232 papers), Avian ecology and behavior (219 papers), Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth (135 papers) and Genetic diversity and population structure (132 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Nature and Landscape Conservation (14.8k citations), Aquatic Science (7.2k citations), Ecology (19.3k citations), Ecological Modeling (2.3k citations) and Global and Planetary Change (10.0k citations). Authors at Texas Parks and Wildlife Department collaborate with scholars in United States, Canada and Australia and have published in prestigious journals including North American Journal of Fisheries Management, Journal of Wildlife Management, Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, Journal of Fish Biology and Journal of Wildlife Diseases. Some of Texas Parks and Wildlife Department's most productive authors include Kirk O. Winemiller, Maurice I. Muoneke, Mark Fisher, David L. Buckmeier, John W. Bickham, W. Michael Childress, Daniel R. Opdyke, Edwin H. Robinson, Robert B. Ditton and Michael L. Morrison.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact