Molecular Foundry

259.5k citations
3.8k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Molecular Foundry

3.7k papers receiving 253.8k citations

Peers

Molecular Foundry
Comparison fields: 5 of 216
  • Structural Biology 7.3k
  • Materials Chemistry 77.4k
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 17k
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 16.5k
  • Biomaterials 11.5k
Replace Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource with:
Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource United States
Advanced Light Source
California NanoSystems Institute United States
Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory United States
Center for Integrated Nanotechnologies United States
Varian Medical Systems (United States) United States
Applied Materials (United States) United States
Centro de Investigación en Materiales Avanzados Mexico
Texas Materials Institute United States
Ames National Laboratory United States
Molecular Foundry relative to Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource United States Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.7×
Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Molecular Foundry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Molecular Foundry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Molecular Foundry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Molecular Foundry more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Molecular Foundry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Molecular Foundry at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Molecular Foundry at the time of their publication.

About Molecular Foundry

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Molecular Foundry have published 3.8k papers, which have received a total of 259.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 349 papers in Structural Biology, 1.2k papers in Materials Chemistry, 196 papers in Biomaterials, 228 papers in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and 425 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics on the topics of Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications (349 papers), Perovskite Materials and Applications (158 papers), 2D Materials and Applications (155 papers), Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties (147 papers), Advancements in Battery Materials (109 papers), Supramolecular Self-Assembly in Materials (105 papers), Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics (104 papers) and Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications (99 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Structural Biology (7.3k citations), Materials Chemistry (77.4k citations), Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (17k citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (16.5k citations) and Biomaterials (11.5k citations). Authors at Molecular Foundry collaborate with scholars in United States, China and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Nano Letters, Journal of the American Chemical Society, Nature Communications, Microscopy and Microanalysis and ACS Nano. Some of Molecular Foundry's most productive authors include Carolyn Ruth Bertozzi, Jeffrey B. Neaton, František Švec, Jeffrey J. Urban, A. Paul Alivisatos, Yadong Yin, Shaul Aloni, Colin Ophus, Ellen M. Sletten and Ronald N. Zuckermann.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact