Food Standards Agency

13.9k citations
391 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

    • Food Safety and Hygiene 42
    • Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology 32
    • Agricultural safety and regulations 24
    • Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research 25

Food Standards Agency

373 papers receiving 13.9k citations

Peers

Food Standards Agency
Comparison fields: 5 of 197
  • Immunology and Allergy 804
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 2k
  • Food Science 2.6k
  • Analytical Chemistry 1.4k
  • Environmental Chemistry 663
Replace Government of the United Kingdom with:
Government of the United Kingdom United Kingdom
Bibra International United Kingdom
Flemish Government Belgium
Kanton Zürich Switzerland
Institut polytechnique LaSalle Beauvais France
Covance (United Kingdom) United Kingdom
Procter & Gamble (Belgium) Belgium
Thermo Fisher Scientific (Germany) Germany
Campden BRI (United Kingdom) United Kingdom
Laboratoire D'étude des Résidus et Contaminants Dans les Aliments France
Food Standards Agency relative to Government of the United Kingdom United Kingdom Government of the United Kingdom's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10.4×
Government of the United Kingdom · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Food Standards Agency

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Food Standards Agency. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Food Standards Agency with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Food Standards Agency more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Food Standards Agency

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Food Standards Agency at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Food Standards Agency at the time of their publication.

About Food Standards Agency

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Food Standards Agency have published 391 papers, which have received a total of 13.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 125 papers in Food Science, 25 papers in Immunology and Allergy, 27 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, 43 papers in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and 2 papers in Chemical Health and Safety on the topics of Food Safety and Hygiene (42 papers), Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact (35 papers), Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology (32 papers), Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation (27 papers), Radioactive contamination and transfer (25 papers), Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research (25 papers), Agricultural safety and regulations (24 papers) and Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior (15 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Immunology and Allergy (804 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (2k citations), Food Science (2.6k citations), Analytical Chemistry (1.4k citations) and Environmental Chemistry (663 citations). Authors at Food Standards Agency collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands and have published in prestigious journals including British Journal Of Nutrition, Food Additives & Contaminants Part A, The Analyst, Food and Chemical Toxicology and Eurosurveillance. Some of Food Standards Agency's most productive authors include Roger Wood, Michael Thompson, Stephen L. R. Ellison, Mark L. Woolfe, Martin Rose, Alwyn Fernandes, Sandy B. Primrose, Diane Benford, David Mortimer and Mamta K. Singh.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact