Temple University
Impact in
- Clinical Psychology top 0.2%
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
-
- Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Papers in
- Clinical Psychology 3.4k
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development 1.4k
-
- Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes 706
- Top scholars
- Sudhir KumarGlen StecherKoichiro TamuraLaurence D. SteinbergRichard G. HeimbergPhilip C. KendallFrank C. SpanoJoseph Wolpe
- Journals
- Journal of Biological Chemistry (568 papers)Blood (335 papers)Journal of Cellular Physiology (329 papers)PLoS ONE (299 papers)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (270 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesChinaItaly
In The Last Decade
Temple University
57.5k papers receiving 2.1M citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
- Clinical Psychology 159.4k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 92.1k
- Molecular Biology 366.8k
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 69.5k
- Social Psychology 110.4k
Countries citing scholars working at Temple University
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Temple University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Temple University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Temple University more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Temple University
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Temple University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Temple University at the time of their publication.
About Temple University
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Temple University have published 65.7k papers, which have received a total of 2.3M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 3.4k papers in Clinical Psychology, 2.0k papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 1.9k papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 8.9k papers in Molecular Biology and 2.2k papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience on the topics of Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (1.4k papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (776 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (706 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (612 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (560 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (556 papers), Platelet Disorders and Treatments (529 papers) and Crime Patterns and Interventions (508 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Clinical Psychology (159.4k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (92.1k citations), Molecular Biology (366.8k citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (69.5k citations) and Social Psychology (110.4k citations). Authors at Temple University collaborate with scholars in United States, China and Italy and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Biological Chemistry, Blood, Journal of Cellular Physiology, PLoS ONE and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Some of Temple University's most productive authors include Sudhir Kumar, Glen Stecher, Koichiro Tamura, Laurence D. Steinberg, Richard G. Heimberg, Philip C. Kendall, Frank C. Spano, Joseph Wolpe, Michael M. Li and Ram Mudambi.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.