Trinity College London

56.0k citations
681 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Trinity College London

567 papers receiving 53.5k citations

Peers

Trinity College London
Comparison fields: 5 of 241
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 13.7k
  • Economics and Econometrics 33.7k
  • Finance 6.6k
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 9.0k
  • General Energy 366
Replace CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis with:
CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis Netherlands
Laboratoire d’Économie d’Orléans France
ICMA Centre United Kingdom
Bruegel Belgium
Centre Pour La Recherche Economique et ses Applications France
CEPN - Centre d'Economie de l'Université Paris Nord France
Nuffield Foundation United Kingdom
Swiss National Bank Switzerland
Institut d'Anàlisi Econòmica Spain
Laboratoire d'Economie Appliquée de Grenoble France
Trinity College London relative to CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis Netherlands CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8.2×
CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Trinity College London

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Trinity College London. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Trinity College London with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Trinity College London more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Trinity College London

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Trinity College London at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Trinity College London at the time of their publication.

About Trinity College London

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Trinity College London have published 681 papers, which have received a total of 56.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 56 papers in Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, 54 papers in Geometry and Topology, 23 papers in History and Philosophy of Science, 35 papers in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and 40 papers in Mathematical Physics on the topics of Limits and Structures in Graph Theory (51 papers), Advanced Graph Theory Research (44 papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (33 papers), Graph theory and applications (23 papers), Spatial and Panel Data Analysis (20 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (19 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (19 papers) and Market Dynamics and Volatility (18 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (13.7k citations), Economics and Econometrics (33.7k citations), Finance (6.6k citations), Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (9.0k citations) and General Energy (366 citations). Authors at Trinity College London collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Econometrics, Random Structures and Algorithms, Journal of Applied Econometrics, Journal of Combinatorial Theory Series B and Journal of Historical Geography. Some of Trinity College London's most productive authors include M. Hashem Pesaran, Yongcheol Shin, Richard J. Smith, Kyung So Im, Ron P Smith, Alexander Chudík, Amartya Kumar Sen, Béla Bollobás, Oliver M. Riordan and Sudhir Anand.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact