Emporia State University

30.4k citations
1.8k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Emporia State University

1.7k papers receiving 30.3k citations

Peers

Emporia State University
Comparison fields: 5 of 241
  • Library and Information Sciences 821
  • Information Systems and Management 1.9k
  • Information Systems 3.2k
  • Safety Research 1.3k
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 859
Replace University of Central Arkansas with:
University of Central Arkansas United States
University of Central Missouri United States
Minnesota State University, Mankato United States
St. Cloud State University United States
Bradley University United States
Murray State University United States
University of Illinois at Springfield United States
Walden University United States
Drake University United States
University of Houston - Clear Lake United States
Emporia State University relative to University of Central Arkansas United States University of Central Arkansas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.7×
University of Central Arkansas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Emporia State University

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Emporia State University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Emporia State University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emporia State University more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Emporia State University

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Emporia State University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Emporia State University at the time of their publication.

About Emporia State University

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Emporia State University have published 1.8k papers, which have received a total of 30.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 129 papers in Library and Information Sciences, 41 papers in Applied Psychology, 195 papers in Information Systems, 217 papers in Education and 51 papers in Information Systems and Management on the topics of Library Science and Information Literacy (89 papers), Library Science and Information (61 papers), Library Science and Administration (53 papers), Web and Library Services (42 papers), scientometrics and bibliometrics research (39 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (34 papers), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (34 papers) and Psychological Testing and Assessment (32 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Library and Information Sciences (821 citations), Information Systems and Management (1.9k citations), Information Systems (3.2k citations), Safety Research (1.3k citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (859 citations). Authors at Emporia State University collaborate with scholars in United States, Bangladesh and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including The Journal of General Psychology, Journal of Management History, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, American Journal of Botany and Journal of Education for Library and Information Science. Some of Emporia State University's most productive authors include Brady Daniel Lund, Elizabeth E. Grandón, Emily Vardell, Michael L. Kent, Maureen Taylor, Stephen F. Davis, Jeffrey E. Muldoon, Elizabeth Dobler, Julie Coiro and Khaled A. Alshare.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact