Emporia State University

30.1k citations
1.9k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Emporia State University

1.7k papers receiving 27.5k citations

Peers

Emporia State University
Comparison fields: 5 of 242
  • Health Informatics 673
  • Library and Information Sciences 576
  • Information Systems and Management 2.6k
  • Communication 1.7k
  • Safety Research 1.3k
Replace University of Central Arkansas with:
University of Central Arkansas United States
University of Central Missouri United States
University of Illinois at Springfield United States
St. Catherine University United States
Minnesota Department of Education United States
Winona State University United States
West Texas A&M University United States
University of Dallas United States
Carleton College United States
University of Nebraska at Kearney United States
Emporia State University relative to University of Central Arkansas United States University of Central Arkansas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.9×
University of Central Arkansas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Emporia State University

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Emporia State University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Emporia State University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emporia State University more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Emporia State University

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Emporia State University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Emporia State University at the time of their publication.

About Emporia State University

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Emporia State University have published 1.9k papers, which have received a total of 30.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 91 papers in Library and Information Sciences, 34 papers in General Psychology, 77 papers in Communication, 48 papers in Applied Psychology and 73 papers in Information Systems and Management on the topics of Library Science and Information Literacy (63 papers), Library Science and Administration (62 papers), Online and Blended Learning (53 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (52 papers), Web and Library Services (48 papers), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (47 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (45 papers) and Knowledge Management and Sharing (42 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Health Informatics (673 citations), Library and Information Sciences (576 citations), Information Systems and Management (2.6k citations), Communication (1.7k citations) and Safety Research (1.3k citations). Authors at Emporia State University collaborate with scholars in United States, China and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including American Journal of Botany, The Journal of General Psychology, Journal of Management History, Journal of the Association for Information Systems and Journal of Clinical Psychology. Some of Emporia State University's most productive authors include Brady Lund, Elizabeth E. Grandón, Emily Vardell, Maureen Taylor, Michael L. Kent, John Pearson, Stephen F. Davis, Elizabeth Dobler, Julie Coiro and Khaled A. Alshare.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact