Science and Technology Policy Institute

15.9k citations
744 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Science and Technology Policy Institute

614 papers receiving 14.5k citations

Peers

Science and Technology Policy Institute
Comparison fields: 5 of 230
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 1.3k
  • Business and International Management 322
  • Strategy and Management 2.2k
  • Economics and Econometrics 2.9k
  • Media Technology 784
Replace Ritsumeikan Asia Pacific University with:
Ritsumeikan Asia Pacific University Japan
Korea Development Institute South Korea
Korea University of International Studies South Korea
Seoul School of Integrated Sciences and Technologies South Korea
East China University of Political Science and Law China
Gyeongju University South Korea
Cheju Halla University South Korea
International University of Japan Japan
United Nations University Japan
Nanzan University Japan
Science and Technology Policy Institute relative to Ritsumeikan Asia Pacific University Japan Ritsumeikan Asia Pacific University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.0×
Ritsumeikan Asia Pacific University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Science and Technology Policy Institute

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Science and Technology Policy Institute. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Science and Technology Policy Institute with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Science and Technology Policy Institute more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Science and Technology Policy Institute

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Science and Technology Policy Institute at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Science and Technology Policy Institute at the time of their publication.

About Science and Technology Policy Institute

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Science and Technology Policy Institute have published 744 papers, which have received a total of 15.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 74 papers in Management of Technology and Innovation, 232 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 124 papers in Strategy and Management, 60 papers in Media Technology and 42 papers in Marketing on the topics of Innovation Policy and R&D (78 papers), ICT Impact and Policies (57 papers), Digital Platforms and Economics (46 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (42 papers), Firm Innovation and Growth (40 papers), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (26 papers), Climate Change Policy and Economics (24 papers) and Intellectual Property and Patents (23 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Management of Technology and Innovation (1.3k citations), Business and International Management (322 citations), Strategy and Management (2.2k citations), Economics and Econometrics (2.9k citations) and Media Technology (784 citations). Authors at Science and Technology Policy Institute collaborate with scholars in South Korea, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Science and Public Policy, Sustainability, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, Scientometrics and Science Technology and Society. Some of Science and Technology Policy Institute's most productive authors include David Hakken, Scott Wallsten, Robert W. Hahn, Phil Macnaghten, Richard Owen, Jack Stilgoe, Heetae Yang, Philip G. Pardey, Julian M. Alston and Mark Lubell.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact