Science and Technology Policy Institute
Impact in
Papers in
-
- Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences 24
-
- Innovation Policy and R&D 70
- Firm Innovation and Growth 39
- Climate Change Policy and Economics 25
- Energy, Environment, Economic Growth 22
- Top scholars
- David HakkenScott WallstenRobert W. HahnPhil MacnaghtenJack StilgoeRichard OwenHeetae YangPhilip G. Pardey
- Journals
- Science and Public Policy (12 papers)Sustainability (10 papers)Technology Analysis and Strategic Management (10 papers)Scientometrics (7 papers)Energy Policy (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- South KoreaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Science and Technology Policy Institute
572 papers receiving 12.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 224
- Management of Technology and Innovation 1.1k
- Business and International Management 275
- Strategy and Management 1.9k
- Economics and Econometrics 2.7k
- Media Technology 721
Countries citing scholars working at Science and Technology Policy Institute
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Science and Technology Policy Institute. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Science and Technology Policy Institute with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Science and Technology Policy Institute more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Science and Technology Policy Institute
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Science and Technology Policy Institute at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Science and Technology Policy Institute at the time of their publication.
About Science and Technology Policy Institute
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Science and Technology Policy Institute have published 685 papers, which have received a total of 13.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 63 papers in Management of Technology and Innovation, 224 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 118 papers in Strategy and Management, 58 papers in Media Technology and 42 papers in Marketing on the topics of Innovation Policy and R&D (70 papers), ICT Impact and Policies (55 papers), Digital Platforms and Economics (46 papers), Firm Innovation and Growth (39 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (39 papers), Climate Change Policy and Economics (25 papers), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (24 papers) and Energy, Environment, Economic Growth (22 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Management of Technology and Innovation (1.1k citations), Business and International Management (275 citations), Strategy and Management (1.9k citations), Economics and Econometrics (2.7k citations) and Media Technology (721 citations). Authors at Science and Technology Policy Institute collaborate with scholars in South Korea, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Science and Public Policy, Sustainability, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, Scientometrics and Energy Policy. Some of Science and Technology Policy Institute's most productive authors include David Hakken, Scott Wallsten, Robert W. Hahn, Phil Macnaghten, Jack Stilgoe, Richard Owen, Heetae Yang, Philip G. Pardey, Julian M. Alston and Mark Lubell.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.