Korea Development Institute

16.1k citations
895 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Korea Development Institute

712 papers receiving 15.0k citations

Peers

Korea Development Institute
Comparison fields: 5 of 230
  • Accounting 1.7k
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1.2k
  • Economics and Econometrics 3.7k
  • Finance 1.2k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 1.9k
Replace Science and Technology Policy Institute with:
Science and Technology Policy Institute South Korea
Ritsumeikan Asia Pacific University Japan
Youngsan University South Korea
National Assembly South Korea
Korea University of International Studies South Korea
Gyeongju University South Korea
Hallym Polytechnic University South Korea
Chinese Academy of Governance China
International University of Japan Japan
Seoul School of Integrated Sciences and Technologies South Korea
Korea Development Institute relative to Science and Technology Policy Institute South Korea Science and Technology Policy Institute's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×9.4×
Science and Technology Policy Institute · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Korea Development Institute

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Korea Development Institute. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Korea Development Institute with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Korea Development Institute more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Korea Development Institute

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Korea Development Institute at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Korea Development Institute at the time of their publication.

About Korea Development Institute

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Korea Development Institute have published 895 papers, which have received a total of 16.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 81 papers in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, 256 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 64 papers in Finance, 67 papers in Accounting and 5 papers in Leadership and Management on the topics of Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (39 papers), Global trade and economics (38 papers), Firm Innovation and Growth (37 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (33 papers), Housing Market and Economics (29 papers), Economic Growth and Productivity (28 papers), Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis (27 papers) and Corporate Finance and Governance (26 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Accounting (1.7k citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (1.2k citations), Economics and Econometrics (3.7k citations), Finance (1.2k citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (1.9k citations). Authors at Korea Development Institute collaborate with scholars in South Korea, United States and Japan and have published in prestigious journals including Fibers and Polymers, Scientific Reports, Journal of Development Economics, Economics Letters and Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology. Some of Korea Development Institute's most productive authors include Sung Wook Joh, Yun‐Joo Koh, Young S. Kim, Young Lee, Sunghoon Chung, Leroy P. Jones, Anand V. Swamy, Stephen Knack, Omar Azfar and Éric Fombonne.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact