Scotland's Rural College

101.1k citations
3.4k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Scotland's Rural College

3.2k papers receiving 101.1k citations

Peers

Scotland's Rural College
Comparison fields: 5 of 237
  • Small Animals 8.8k
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 10.1k
  • Soil Science 10.8k
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4.7k
  • Animal Science and Zoology 4.3k
Replace Scottish Agricultural College with:
Scottish Agricultural College United Kingdom
Agri Food and Biosciences Institute United Kingdom
Agricultural Development Advisory Service (United Kingdom) United Kingdom
Institute of Biological, Environmental and Rural Sciences United Kingdom
Institut Agro Rennes-Angers France
Harper Adams University United Kingdom
James Hutton Institute United Kingdom
Instituut voor Landbouw en Visserijonderzoek Belgium
Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech Belgium
Quadram Institute United Kingdom
Scotland's Rural College relative to Scottish Agricultural College United Kingdom Scottish Agricultural College's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.7×
Scottish Agricultural College · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Scotland's Rural College

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Scotland's Rural College. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Scotland's Rural College with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scotland's Rural College more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Scotland's Rural College

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Scotland's Rural College at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Scotland's Rural College at the time of their publication.

About Scotland's Rural College

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Scotland's Rural College have published 3.4k papers, which have received a total of 101.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 492 papers in Small Animals, 404 papers in Agronomy and Crop Science, 188 papers in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, 272 papers in Soil Science and 169 papers in Animal Science and Zoology on the topics of Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (379 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (337 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (200 papers), Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (149 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (93 papers), Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis (91 papers), Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (90 papers) and Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact (88 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Small Animals (8.8k citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (10.1k citations), Soil Science (10.8k citations), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (4.7k citations) and Animal Science and Zoology (4.3k citations). Authors at Scotland's Rural College collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, India and United States and have published in prestigious journals including animal, Scientific Reports, Journal of Dairy Science, PLoS ONE and Applied Animal Behaviour Science. Some of Scotland's Rural College's most productive authors include Vijay Kumar Thakur, Vijai Kumar Gupta, Robert Martin Rees, Andrew Peter Barnes, Simon P. Turner, Dominic Moran, Klaus Glenk, Bryan S. Griffiths, Pankaj Raizada and Samarjeet Singh Siwal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact