Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences

42.4k papers receiving 1.7M citations

Peers

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Comparison fields: 5 of 248
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 183.5k
  • Soil Science 139.0k
  • Equine 19.1k
  • Insect Science 149.0k
  • Ecology 301.9k
Replace Norwegian University of Life Sciences with:
Norwegian University of Life Sciences Norway
Technical University of Denmark Denmark
Wageningen University & Research Netherlands
Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel Germany
BOKU University Austria
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg Germany
University of Liège Belgium
University of Hohenheim Germany
Norwegian University of Science and Technology Norway
University of Eastern Finland Finland
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences relative to Norwegian University of Life Sciences Norway Norwegian University of Life Sciences's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.4×
Norwegian University of Life Sciences · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences at the time of their publication.

About Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences have published 45.1k papers, which have received a total of 1.7M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 891 papers in Equine, 4.2k papers in Agronomy and Crop Science, 5.1k papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 2.8k papers in Small Animals and 3.8k papers in Insect Science on the topics of Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (2.2k papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (2.0k papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (1.8k papers), Plant and animal studies (1.7k papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (1.7k papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (1.7k papers), Forest ecology and management (1.6k papers) and Forest Management and Policy (1.6k papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Nature and Landscape Conservation (183.5k citations), Soil Science (139.0k citations), Equine (19.1k citations), Insect Science (149.0k citations) and Ecology (301.9k citations). Authors at Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences collaborate with scholars in Sweden, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Acta veterinaria Scandinavica, Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, Forest Ecology and Management, PLoS ONE and Scientific Reports. Some of Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences's most productive authors include David A. Wardle, Peter Högberg, Göran I. Ågren, Leif Andersson, Afaf Kamal‐Eldin, Hjalmar Laudon, Heriberto Rodríguez‐Martínez, Jan Stenlid, Karin Ljung and Sara Hallin.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact