Shanghai International Studies University
Impact in
- Language and Linguistics top 2%
- EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
-
- Second Language Learning and Teaching
Papers in
-
- EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning 163
- Translation Studies and Practices 86
- Top scholars
- Rod EllisAlexander Scott EnglishYanqing JiangMuhammad AfzaalWeijun WangBenjamin H. NamJian ZhangChunmei Gan
- Journals
- Frontiers in Psychology (107 papers)Scientific Reports (36 papers)Sustainability (29 papers)System (25 papers)NeuroImage (23 papers)
- Partner nations
- ChinaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Shanghai International Studies University
2.4k papers receiving 28.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 240
- Language and Linguistics 5.1k
- Literature and Literary Theory 3.7k
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 3.3k
- Marketing 2.1k
- Linguistics and Language 1.1k
Countries citing scholars working at Shanghai International Studies University
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Shanghai International Studies University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Shanghai International Studies University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Shanghai International Studies University more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Shanghai International Studies University
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Shanghai International Studies University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Shanghai International Studies University at the time of their publication.
About Shanghai International Studies University
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Shanghai International Studies University have published 3.3k papers, which have received a total of 31.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 363 papers in Language and Linguistics, 104 papers in Linguistics and Language, 249 papers in Literature and Literary Theory, 259 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 134 papers in Communication on the topics of EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (163 papers), Second Language Learning and Teaching (145 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (101 papers), Digital Marketing and Social Media (99 papers), Energy, Environment, Economic Growth (89 papers), Translation Studies and Practices (86 papers), Second Language Acquisition and Learning (82 papers) and Natural Language Processing Techniques (79 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Language and Linguistics (5.1k citations), Literature and Literary Theory (3.7k citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (3.3k citations), Marketing (2.1k citations) and Linguistics and Language (1.1k citations). Authors at Shanghai International Studies University collaborate with scholars in China, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Frontiers in Psychology, Scientific Reports, Sustainability, System and NeuroImage. Some of Shanghai International Studies University's most productive authors include Rod Ellis, Alexander Scott English, Yanqing Jiang, Muhammad Afzaal, Weijun Wang, Benjamin H. Nam, Jian Zhang, Chunmei Gan, Steve J. Kulich and Dongmin Kong.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.