Shanghai FRP Research Institute (China)

3.9k citations
343 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Shanghai FRP Research Institute (China)

283 papers receiving 3.9k citations

Peers

Shanghai FRP Research Institute (China)
Comparison fields: 5 of 197
  • Cancer Research 296
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 125
  • Civil and Structural Engineering 270
  • Molecular Biology 829
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 90
Replace Shanghai Municipal People's Government with:
Shanghai Municipal People's Government China
Jiangsu Institute of Metrology China
Hangzhou DAC Biotech (China) China
Shanghai Liangyou (China) China
Dongwha Pharm (South Korea) South Korea
Yueqing People's Hospital China
People's Liberation Army Air Force China
Kurume Institute of Technology Japan
Xianning Central Hospital China
Daewoo Pharma (South Korea) South Korea
Shanghai FRP Research Institute (China) relative to Shanghai Municipal People's Government China Shanghai Municipal People's Government's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.9×
Shanghai Municipal People's Government · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Shanghai FRP Research Institute (China)

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Shanghai FRP Research Institute (China). It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Shanghai FRP Research Institute (China) with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Shanghai FRP Research Institute (China) more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Shanghai FRP Research Institute (China)

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Shanghai FRP Research Institute (China) at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Shanghai FRP Research Institute (China) at the time of their publication.

About Shanghai FRP Research Institute (China)

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Shanghai FRP Research Institute (China) have published 343 papers, which have received a total of 3.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 11 papers in General Engineering, 12 papers in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, 28 papers in Civil and Structural Engineering, 16 papers in Cancer Research and 6 papers in Ceramics and Composites on the topics of Structural Health Monitoring Techniques (11 papers), Civil and Geotechnical Engineering Research (11 papers), Geomechanics and Mining Engineering (8 papers), MXene and MAX Phase Materials (8 papers), Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (8 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (7 papers), Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring (7 papers) and Glaucoma and retinal disorders (7 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Cancer Research (296 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (125 citations), Civil and Structural Engineering (270 citations), Molecular Biology (829 citations) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (90 citations). Authors at Shanghai FRP Research Institute (China) collaborate with scholars in China, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Structural Control and Health Monitoring, Eye and Vision, Journal of Translational Medicine, Advanced Materials and LWT. Some of Shanghai FRP Research Institute (China)'s most productive authors include Guy Abel, Joel E. Cohen, Limin Sun, Ye Xia, Lei Wang, Xiaojun Wang, P.D. Nixon, Chantal E. Stern, R.E. Passingham and Wei Cai.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact