Shanghai FRP Research Institute (China)

5.8k citations
446 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Shanghai FRP Research Institute (China)

344 papers receiving 5.0k citations

Peers

Shanghai FRP Research Institute (China)
Comparison fields: 5 of 201
  • Urology 199
  • Cancer Research 351
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 545
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 130
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 258
Replace Kuang Tien General Hospital with:
Kuang Tien General Hospital Taiwan
Shanghai Liangyou (China) China
First People's Hospital of Yuhang District China
Shanghai Municipal People's Government China
Taipei Municipal Jen-Ai Hospital Taiwan
Xianning Central Hospital China
Soonchunhyang University Hospital Cheonan South Korea
Fujian Provincial People's Hospital China
Dongwha Pharm (South Korea) South Korea
Anqing City Hospital China
Shanghai FRP Research Institute (China) relative to Kuang Tien General Hospital Taiwan Kuang Tien General Hospital's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.2×
Kuang Tien General Hospital · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Shanghai FRP Research Institute (China)

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Shanghai FRP Research Institute (China). It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Shanghai FRP Research Institute (China) with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Shanghai FRP Research Institute (China) more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Shanghai FRP Research Institute (China)

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Shanghai FRP Research Institute (China) at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Shanghai FRP Research Institute (China) at the time of their publication.

About Shanghai FRP Research Institute (China)

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Shanghai FRP Research Institute (China) have published 446 papers, which have received a total of 5.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 13 papers in General Engineering, 30 papers in Civil and Structural Engineering, 12 papers in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, 7 papers in Ceramics and Composites and 15 papers in Cancer Research on the topics of Civil and Geotechnical Engineering Research (13 papers), Structural Health Monitoring Techniques (11 papers), Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (9 papers), Geomechanics and Mining Engineering (9 papers), Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments (8 papers), MXene and MAX Phase Materials (8 papers), Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring (7 papers) and Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies (7 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Urology (199 citations), Cancer Research (351 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (545 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (130 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (258 citations). Authors at Shanghai FRP Research Institute (China) collaborate with scholars in China, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Structural Control and Health Monitoring, Cell Death and Disease, Eye and Vision, LWT and Virology Journal. Some of Shanghai FRP Research Institute (China)'s most productive authors include Guy Abel, Joel E. Cohen, Wei Cai, Ye Xia, Limin Sun, Yongtao Xiao, Juxi Hu, Ying Lu, Lei Wang and I.F. Sommerville.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact