Scientific Services

40.5k citations
1.6k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Scientific Services

1.5k papers receiving 38.7k citations

Peers

Scientific Services
Comparison fields: 5 of 232
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 8.5k
  • Ecological Modeling 2.5k
  • Ecology 11.7k
  • Global and Planetary Change 9.0k
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 2.9k
Replace City of Cape Town with:
City of Cape Town South Africa
South African National Parks South Africa
South African Environmental Observation Network South Africa
Umkhuseli Innovation and Research Management South Africa
South African Tuberculosis Vaccine Initiative South Africa
Botswana International University of Science and Technology Botswana
Department of Forestry Malawi
University of Lubumbashi Democratic Republic of the Congo
Institut de Recherche pour le Développement Republic of the Congo
Agostinho Neto University Angola
Scientific Services relative to City of Cape Town South Africa City of Cape Town's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.2×
City of Cape Town · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Scientific Services

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Scientific Services. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Scientific Services with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scientific Services more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Scientific Services

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Scientific Services at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Scientific Services at the time of their publication.

About Scientific Services

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Scientific Services have published 1.6k papers, which have received a total of 40.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 372 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 100 papers in Ecological Modeling, 492 papers in Ecology, 281 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 101 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law on the topics of Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (277 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (227 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (100 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (97 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (89 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (73 papers), Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology (72 papers) and Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (62 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Nature and Landscape Conservation (8.5k citations), Ecological Modeling (2.5k citations), Ecology (11.7k citations), Global and Planetary Change (9.0k citations) and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (2.9k citations). Authors at Scientific Services collaborate with scholars in South Africa, United Kingdom and United States and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, Biological Conservation, Water SA, Potato Research and African Journal of Wildlife Research. Some of Scientific Services's most productive authors include Joseph T. Schaefer, Izak P. J. Smit, Sam M. Ferreira, P. E. J. Flewitt, Harry Biggs, Tineke Kraaij, Navashni Govender, Gordon Nonhebel, A.T. Stewart and Brian W. van Wilgen.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact