Research Institute for Fragrance Materials

9.2k citations
655 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

    • Contact Dermatitis and Allergies 365
    • Skin Protection and Aging 48
    • Animal testing and alternatives 219

Research Institute for Fragrance Materials

601 papers receiving 8.4k citations

Peers

Research Institute for Fragrance Materials
Comparison fields: 5 of 180
  • Dermatology 2.5k
  • Chemical Health and Safety 151
  • Small Animals 1.3k
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 2.2k
  • Pollution 1.1k
Replace Unilever (United States) with:
Unilever (United States) United States
Health and Environmental Sciences Institute United States
American Chemistry Council United States
Takasago (United States) United States
Japan Tobacco (United States) United States
Immunomedics (United States) United States
Office of Dietary Supplements United States
BioEnergetics (United States) United States
Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma (United States) United States
Albany Molecular Research (United States) United States
Research Institute for Fragrance Materials relative to Unilever (United States) United States Unilever (United States)'s profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.3×
Unilever (United States) · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Research Institute for Fragrance Materials

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Research Institute for Fragrance Materials. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Research Institute for Fragrance Materials with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Research Institute for Fragrance Materials more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Research Institute for Fragrance Materials

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Research Institute for Fragrance Materials at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Research Institute for Fragrance Materials at the time of their publication.

About Research Institute for Fragrance Materials

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Research Institute for Fragrance Materials have published 655 papers, which have received a total of 9.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 370 papers in Dermatology, 219 papers in Small Animals, 85 papers in Sensory Systems, 99 papers in Biotechnology and 6 papers in Chemical Health and Safety on the topics of Contact Dermatitis and Allergies (365 papers), Animal testing and alternatives (219 papers), Antimicrobial agents and applications (102 papers), Biochemical and biochemical processes (99 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (85 papers), Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity (74 papers), Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery (50 papers) and Skin Protection and Aging (48 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Dermatology (2.5k citations), Chemical Health and Safety (151 citations), Small Animals (1.3k citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (2.2k citations) and Pollution (1.1k citations). Authors at Research Institute for Fragrance Materials collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Food and Chemical Toxicology, Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, Toxicology Letters, Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry and Toxicology in Vitro. Some of Research Institute for Fragrance Materials's most productive authors include A.M. Api, D.L.J. Opdyke, C.S. Letizia, R.A. Ford, S.P. Bhatia, J. Lalko, D. McGinty, A. Lapczynski, Froukje Balk and I.C. Munro.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact