Office of Dietary Supplements
Impact in
- Nutrition and Dietetics top 10%
- Vitamin C and Antioxidants Research
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 10%
- Vitamin D Research Studies
Papers in
-
- Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies 43
- Top scholars
- Regan L BaileyJohanna DwyerMary Frances PiccianoElizabeth A YetleyHerb BrodyRichard HodsonJaime GahcheCindy D. Davis
- Journals
- Journal of Nutrition (76 papers)American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (66 papers)Nature (65 papers)The FASEB Journal (30 papers)Journal of AOAC International (24 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Office of Dietary Supplements
534 papers receiving 22.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 212
- Nutrition and Dietetics 5.4k
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 5.3k
- Rheumatology 2.6k
- Complementary and alternative medicine 1.4k
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 4.6k
Countries citing scholars working at Office of Dietary Supplements
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Office of Dietary Supplements. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Office of Dietary Supplements with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Office of Dietary Supplements more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Office of Dietary Supplements
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Office of Dietary Supplements at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Office of Dietary Supplements at the time of their publication.
About Office of Dietary Supplements
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Office of Dietary Supplements have published 673 papers, which have received a total of 29.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 56 papers in Complementary and alternative medicine, 94 papers in Nutrition and Dietetics, 34 papers in Biochemistry, 94 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine and 129 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health on the topics of Nutritional Studies and Diet (82 papers), Vitamin D Research Studies (67 papers), Folate and B Vitamins Research (53 papers), Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling (50 papers), Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease (45 papers), Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (43 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (39 papers) and Diet and metabolism studies (35 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Nutrition and Dietetics (5.4k citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (5.3k citations), Rheumatology (2.6k citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (1.4k citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (4.6k citations). Authors at Office of Dietary Supplements collaborate with scholars in United States, Canada and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Nutrition, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Nature, The FASEB Journal and Journal of AOAC International. Some of Office of Dietary Supplements's most productive authors include Regan L Bailey, Johanna Dwyer, Mary Frances Picciano, Elizabeth A Yetley, Herb Brody, Richard Hodson, Jaime Gahche, Cindy D. Davis, Keith P. West and Robert E. Black.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.