Regent University

24.8k citations
1.2k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

    • Contemporary Christian Leadership and Education 98
    • Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies 66
    • Biblical Studies and Interpretation 39
  • Health 111
    • Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology 105

Regent University

1k papers receiving 24.8k citations

Peers

Regent University
Comparison fields: 5 of 183
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 2.9k
  • Education 7k
  • Health 1.4k
  • Social Psychology 2.8k
  • Demography 1.3k
Replace American Institutes for Research with:
American Institutes for Research United States
Shippensburg University United States
Salisbury University United States
American Psychological Association United States
Winthrop University United States
Christopher Newport University United States
New York State School of Industrial and Labor Relations United States
University of North Carolina at Pembroke United States
Kutztown University United States
University of Mary Washington United States
Regent University relative to American Institutes for Research United States American Institutes for Research's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
American Institutes for Research · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Regent University

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Regent University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Regent University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Regent University more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Regent University

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Regent University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Regent University at the time of their publication.

About Regent University

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Regent University have published 1.2k papers, which have received a total of 24.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 204 papers in Religious studies, 111 papers in Health, 105 papers in Demography, 97 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and 143 papers in Social Psychology on the topics of Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (105 papers), Leadership and Management in Organizations (100 papers), Contemporary Christian Leadership and Education (98 papers), Workplace Spirituality and Leadership (94 papers), Online and Blended Learning (71 papers), Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies (66 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (52 papers) and Biblical Studies and Interpretation (39 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (2.9k citations), Education (7k citations), Health (1.4k citations), Social Psychology (2.8k citations) and Demography (1.3k citations). Authors at Regent University collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Australia and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Psychology and Theology, Pneuma, The Internet and Higher Education, Journal of Research on Christian Education and Leadership & Organization Development Journal. Some of Regent University's most productive authors include Alfred P. Rovai, William J. Brown, Dail Fields, A. Gregory Stone, Bruce E. Winston, Kathleen Patterson, Mark A. Yarhouse, Jason D. Baker, Hope Jordan and Mihai C. Bocârnea.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact