Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada
Impact in
- Family Practice top 1%
- Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
-
- Innovations in Medical Education
Papers in
-
- Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills 73
-
- Innovations in Medical Education 185
- Health and Medical Research Impacts 23
- Top scholars
- Jason R. FrankLinda SnellJonathan SherbinoTanya HorsleyAlain MorinC. H. GilesEric S. HolmboeG.R. Heal
- Journals
- Medical Teacher (55 papers)Journal of Small Animal Practice (50 papers)British Journal of Pharmacology (47 papers)Nature (43 papers)Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology (41 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada
1.4k papers receiving 34.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 247
- Family Practice 2.1k
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 8.0k
- Research and Theory 187
- Emergency Medical Services 891
- Small Animals 998
Countries citing scholars working at Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada at the time of their publication.
About Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada have published 1.6k papers, which have received a total of 42.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 73 papers in Family Practice, 241 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 50 papers in Small Animals, 129 papers in General Health Professions and 33 papers in Emergency Medical Services on the topics of Innovations in Medical Education (185 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (73 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (30 papers), Radiology practices and education (28 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (26 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (23 papers), Health and Medical Research Impacts (23 papers) and Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (22 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Family Practice (2.1k citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (8.0k citations), Research and Theory (187 citations), Emergency Medical Services (891 citations) and Small Animals (998 citations). Authors at Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada collaborate with scholars in Canada, United Kingdom and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Medical Teacher, Journal of Small Animal Practice, British Journal of Pharmacology, Nature and Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology. Some of Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada's most productive authors include Jason R. Frank, Linda Snell, Jonathan Sherbino, Tanya Horsley, Alain Morin, C. H. Giles, Eric S. Holmboe, G.R. Heal, D. Dollimore and William R. Morrison.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.