Pearson (United States)

2.3k papers receiving 71.5k citations

Peers

Pearson (United States)
Comparison fields: 5 of 250
  • Computational Mathematics 541
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 7.1k
  • Computer Science Applications 2.7k
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 1.6k
  • Clinical Psychology 7.3k
Replace Educational Testing Service with:
Educational Testing Service United States
Fairleigh Dickinson University United States
Bucknell University United States
SUNY Brockport United States
Pace University United States
SUNY New Paltz United States
College of Charleston United States
Northampton Community College United States
University of New Hampshire at Manchester United States
Conway School of Landscape Design United States
Pearson (United States) relative to Educational Testing Service United States Educational Testing Service's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Educational Testing Service · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Pearson (United States)

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Pearson (United States). It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Pearson (United States) with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pearson (United States) more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Pearson (United States)

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Pearson (United States) at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Pearson (United States) at the time of their publication.

About Pearson (United States)

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Pearson (United States) have published 2.7k papers, which have received a total of 79.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 198 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 127 papers in Safety Research, 153 papers in Management Science and Operations Research, 227 papers in Clinical Psychology and 330 papers in Education on the topics of Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (109 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (81 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (74 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (71 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (55 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (53 papers), Parental Involvement in Education (52 papers) and Family and Disability Support Research (50 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Computational Mathematics (541 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (7.1k citations), Computer Science Applications (2.7k citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (1.6k citations) and Clinical Psychology (7.3k citations). Authors at Pearson (United States) collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Spain and have published in prestigious journals including Circulation, Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, Children and Youth Services Review, Applied Measurement in Education and Educational Measurement Issues and Practice. Some of Pearson (United States)'s most productive authors include Scott E. Caplan, Marina Umaschi Bers, Maryanne Wolf, Richard M. Lerner, Rod Ellis, Misha E. Kilmer, Richard M. Lerner, Carla D. Martin, Thomas A. Pearson and Walt Partenheimer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact