Reckitt Benckiser (United Kingdom)

385 papers receiving 12.7k citations

Peers

Reckitt Benckiser (United Kingdom)
Comparison fields: 5 of 218
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 3.8k
  • Gastroenterology 1.0k
  • Pharmaceutical Science 676
  • Physiology 1.9k
  • Molecular Biology 4.3k
Replace Mundipharma (United Kingdom) with:
Mundipharma (United Kingdom) United Kingdom
Hertfordshire Community NHS Trust United Kingdom
East Cheshire NHS Trust United Kingdom
GlaxoSmithKline (France) France
Bibra International United Kingdom
Covance (United Kingdom) United Kingdom
Institute of Clinical Research United Kingdom
Polyclinic Medical University Switzerland
Chiesi (France) France
Access to Nutrition Foundation Netherlands
Reckitt Benckiser (United Kingdom) relative to Mundipharma (United Kingdom) United Kingdom Mundipharma (United Kingdom)'s profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
Mundipharma (United Kingdom) · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Reckitt Benckiser (United Kingdom)

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Reckitt Benckiser (United Kingdom). It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Reckitt Benckiser (United Kingdom) with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Reckitt Benckiser (United Kingdom) more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Reckitt Benckiser (United Kingdom)

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Reckitt Benckiser (United Kingdom) at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Reckitt Benckiser (United Kingdom) at the time of their publication.

About Reckitt Benckiser (United Kingdom)

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Reckitt Benckiser (United Kingdom) have published 477 papers, which have received a total of 14.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 49 papers in Gastroenterology, 21 papers in Pharmaceutical Science, 6 papers in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 36 papers in Pharmacology and 28 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience on the topics of Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments (43 papers), Inflammatory mediators and NSAID effects (21 papers), Respiratory and Cough-Related Research (19 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (19 papers), Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies (18 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (15 papers), Streptococcal Infections and Treatments (14 papers) and Asthma and respiratory diseases (13 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (3.8k citations), Gastroenterology (1.0k citations), Pharmaceutical Science (676 citations), Physiology (1.9k citations) and Molecular Biology (4.3k citations). Authors at Reckitt Benckiser (United Kingdom) collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands and have published in prestigious journals including Biochemical Society Transactions, Journal of Stored Products Research, Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Current Medical Research and Opinion and International Journal of Pharmaceutics. Some of Reckitt Benckiser (United Kingdom)'s most productive authors include H. W. Kosterlitz, B.A. Morgan, Joel W. Hughes, Linda A. Fothergill, Terry Smith, Howard R. Morris, Peter W. Dettmar, Michael J. Rance, Frank Hampson and H. O. J. COLLIER.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact