Quality Research

142.7k citations
4.9k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Quality Research

4.4k papers receiving 133.1k citations

Peers

Quality Research
Comparison fields: 5 of 247
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 14.2k
  • Environmental Chemistry 9.6k
  • Soil Science 8.6k
  • Environmental Engineering 10.0k
  • Water Science and Technology 9.5k
Replace U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center with:
U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center United States
Jackson State University United States
Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública Mexico
Universidad Autónoma de Coahuila Mexico
Tuskegee University United States
Universidad Juárez del Estado de Durango Mexico
Oak Ridge Associated Universities United States
National Center for Environmental Health United States
Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education United States
Texas A&M Health Science Center United States
Quality Research relative to U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center United States U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Quality Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Quality Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Quality Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Quality Research more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Quality Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Quality Research at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Quality Research at the time of their publication.

About Quality Research

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Quality Research have published 4.9k papers, which have received a total of 142.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 475 papers in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, 303 papers in Environmental Chemistry, 1.1k papers in Plant Science, 237 papers in Soil Science and 335 papers in Environmental Engineering on the topics of Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols (254 papers), Air Quality and Health Impacts (251 papers), Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology (249 papers), Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (173 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (145 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (131 papers), Genetics and Plant Breeding (130 papers) and Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology (124 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (14.2k citations), Environmental Chemistry (9.6k citations), Soil Science (8.6k citations), Environmental Engineering (10.0k citations) and Water Science and Technology (9.5k citations). Authors at Quality Research collaborate with scholars in United States, China and Macao and have published in prestigious journals including Poultry Science, Journal of Economic Entomology, Journal of Environmental Quality, RSC Advances and Cereal Chemistry. Some of Quality Research's most productive authors include Pratim Biswas, Claes Fornell, Emanuel Epstein, Eugene W. Anderson, Kenneth A. Sudduth, Anthony S. Wexler, Michael D. Johnson, Andrew N. Sharpley, Barbara Everitt Bryant and Mansoor A. Khan.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact