Queens University

3.5k papers receiving 101.3k citations

Peers

Queens University
Comparison fields: 5 of 249
  • Pharmaceutical Science 2.1k
  • Ecological Modeling 1.5k
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 1.4k
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 912
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 8.1k
Replace Institute of Science and Technology with:
Institute of Science and Technology United Kingdom
Christ University India
University of Wales Institute Cardiff Singapore
National Taipei University Taiwan
Northwestern University Philippines
National Research Tomsk State University Russia
Nazarbayev University Kazakhstan
University of the Philippines Diliman Philippines
University of the Philippines System Philippines
Luther University South Korea
Queens University relative to Institute of Science and Technology United Kingdom Institute of Science and Technology's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×19×
Institute of Science and Technology · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Queens University

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Queens University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Queens University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Queens University more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Queens University

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Queens University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Queens University at the time of their publication.

About Queens University

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Queens University have published 4.3k papers, which have received a total of 116.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 38 papers in Public Administration, 231 papers in General Health Professions, 179 papers in Clinical Psychology, 50 papers in Emergency Medical Services and 55 papers in Health on the topics of Corporate Finance and Governance (47 papers), Irish and British Studies (46 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (31 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (31 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (29 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (28 papers), Sport Psychology and Performance (28 papers) and Asthma and respiratory diseases (27 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Pharmaceutical Science (2.1k citations), Ecological Modeling (1.5k citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (1.4k citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (912 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (8.1k citations). Authors at Queens University collaborate with scholars in Bangladesh, United Kingdom and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Sociology of Sport Journal, Gut and Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology. Some of Queens University's most productive authors include Jean Côté, Duncan Q.M. Craig, Helen Noble, Joanna Smith, Paul R. Martin, Cameron K. Ghalambor, Joshua J. Tewksbury, Raymond B. Huey, Curtis Deutsch and David C. Haak.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact