United States Army Institute of Surgical Research
Impact in
-
- Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation
- Emergency Medicine top 0.5%
- Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
- Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Papers in
-
- Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation 597
-
- Trauma and Emergency Care Studies 307
- Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation 264
- Top scholars
- John B. HolcombBasil A. PruittCharles E. WadeArthur D. MasonVíctor A. ConvertinoJoseph C. WenkeLeopoldo C. CancioMichael A. Dubick
- Journals
- The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care (166 papers)Journal of Burn Care & Research (155 papers)Burns (110 papers)Transfusion (104 papers)Shock (102 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomNorway
In The Last Decade
United States Army Institute of Surgical Research
3.0k papers receiving 89.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 232
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 25.3k
- Emergency Medicine 18.7k
- Rehabilitation 11.0k
- Biochemistry 4.4k
- Emergency Medical Services 4.2k
Countries citing scholars working at United States Army Institute of Surgical Research
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at United States Army Institute of Surgical Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at United States Army Institute of Surgical Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites United States Army Institute of Surgical Research more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at United States Army Institute of Surgical Research
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with United States Army Institute of Surgical Research at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with United States Army Institute of Surgical Research at the time of their publication.
About United States Army Institute of Surgical Research
In recent decades, authors affiliated with United States Army Institute of Surgical Research have published 3.8k papers, which have received a total of 111.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 690 papers in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, 566 papers in Emergency Medicine, 331 papers in Rehabilitation, 179 papers in Emergency Medical Services and 690 papers in Epidemiology on the topics of Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation (597 papers), Burn Injury Management and Outcomes (472 papers), Wound Healing and Treatments (310 papers), Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (307 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (264 papers), Disaster Response and Management (153 papers), Blood transfusion and management (103 papers) and Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (102 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (25.3k citations), Emergency Medicine (18.7k citations), Rehabilitation (11.0k citations), Biochemistry (4.4k citations) and Emergency Medical Services (4.2k citations). Authors at United States Army Institute of Surgical Research collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Norway and have published in prestigious journals including The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care, Journal of Burn Care & Research, Burns, Transfusion and Shock. Some of United States Army Institute of Surgical Research's most productive authors include John B. Holcomb, Basil A. Pruitt, Charles E. Wade, Arthur D. Mason, Víctor A. Convertino, Joseph C. Wenke, Leopoldo C. Cancio, Michael A. Dubick, Philip C. Spinella and Douglas W. Wilmore.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.