Queen Elizabeth II Hospital
Impact in
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
- Eating Disorders and Behaviors
- Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
-
- Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Papers in
-
- Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders 80
- Eating Disorders and Behaviors 26
- Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies 21
- Top scholars
- Naomi FinebergBarbara J. SahakianSamuel R. ChamberlainTrevor W. RobbinsTim M. GalePeter WinocourDavid J Henderson‐SmartKen Farrington
- Journals
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (19 papers)Diabetic Medicine (11 papers)The British Journal of Psychiatry (9 papers)Journal of Psychopharmacology (8 papers)International Clinical Psychopharmacology (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Queen Elizabeth II Hospital
493 papers receiving 15.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 219
- Clinical Psychology 4.8k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 2.1k
- Cognitive Neuroscience 3.1k
- Psychiatry and Mental health 1.9k
- Gastroenterology 541
Countries citing scholars working at Queen Elizabeth II Hospital
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Queen Elizabeth II Hospital. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Queen Elizabeth II Hospital with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Queen Elizabeth II Hospital more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Queen Elizabeth II Hospital
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Queen Elizabeth II Hospital at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Queen Elizabeth II Hospital at the time of their publication.
About Queen Elizabeth II Hospital
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Queen Elizabeth II Hospital have published 526 papers, which have received a total of 16.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 94 papers in Clinical Psychology, 1 paper in Medical Terminology, 49 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 52 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health and 53 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience on the topics of Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (80 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (36 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (30 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (26 papers), Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies (21 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (16 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (15 papers) and Diabetes Treatment and Management (15 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Clinical Psychology (4.8k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (2.1k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (3.1k citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (1.9k citations) and Gastroenterology (541 citations). Authors at Queen Elizabeth II Hospital collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, Australia and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Diabetic Medicine, The British Journal of Psychiatry, Journal of Psychopharmacology and International Clinical Psychopharmacology. Some of Queen Elizabeth II Hospital's most productive authors include Naomi Fineberg, Barbara J. Sahakian, Samuel R. Chamberlain, Trevor W. Robbins, Tim M. Gale, Peter Winocour, David J Henderson‐Smart, Ken Farrington, Dhruv K. Singh and Lelia Duley.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.