Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo

8.3k papers receiving 61.0k citations

Peers

Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
Comparison fields: 5 of 246
  • Sensory Systems 1.3k
  • Information Systems and Management 2.0k
  • Education 8.1k
  • Occupational Therapy 1.0k
  • Speech and Hearing 1.5k
Replace Hospital de Clínicas da Unicamp with:
Hospital de Clínicas da Unicamp Brazil
Universidade Estadual de Londrina Brazil
Universidade Brasil Brazil
Hospital Universitário da Universidade de São Paulo Brazil
Universidade de Ribeirão Preto Brazil
Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro Brazil
Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora Brazil
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas Brazil
Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo Brazil
Universidade São Francisco Brazil
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo relative to Hospital de Clínicas da Unicamp Brazil Hospital de Clínicas da Unicamp's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.4×
Hospital de Clínicas da Unicamp · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo at the time of their publication.

About Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo have published 12.0k papers, which have received a total of 71.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 735 papers in Information Systems and Management, 530 papers in Urban Studies, 863 papers in Literature and Literary Theory, 773 papers in Philosophy and 2.9k papers in Sociology and Political Science on the topics of Education Pedagogy and Practices (1.0k papers), Education and Digital Technologies (761 papers), Business and Management Studies (700 papers), Psychology and Mental Health (615 papers), Linguistics and Education Research (603 papers), Brazilian Legal Issues (592 papers), Social and Political Issues (481 papers) and Cultural, Media, and Literary Studies (428 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Sensory Systems (1.3k citations), Information Systems and Management (2.0k citations), Education (8.1k citations), Occupational Therapy (1.0k citations) and Speech and Hearing (1.5k citations). Authors at Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo collaborate with scholars in Brazil, United States and Portugal and have published in prestigious journals including Bakhtiniana Revista de Estudos do Discurso, Cadernos de Pesquisa, CoDAS, Estudos Avançados and Ciência & Saúde Coletiva. Some of Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo's most productive authors include Paulo Freiré, Rodrigo Custódio Urban, Liane Yuri Kondo Nakada, Eliana Aparecida de Rezende Duek, Léslie Piccolotto Ferreira, Mary Jane Paris Spink, Tony Berber Sardinha, Paulo R. de Souza Mendes, Áquilas Mendes and Joao A. Mattar.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact