Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador

54.8k citations
5.5k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador

4.1k papers receiving 51.5k citations

Peers

Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador
Comparison fields: 5 of 244
  • Ecological Modeling 6.8k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 10.0k
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 10.8k
  • Global and Planetary Change 8.9k
  • Ecology 9.0k
Replace Universidad San Francisco de Quito with:
Universidad San Francisco de Quito Ecuador
Universidad Técnica de Ambato Ecuador
University of the Andes Venezuela
Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja Ecuador
Central University of Ecuador Ecuador
National University of San Marcos Peru
Universidad Nacional Costa Rica
Universidad de Panamá Panama
National Polytechnic School Ecuador
Universidad de Costa Rica Costa Rica
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador relative to Universidad San Francisco de Quito Ecuador Universidad San Francisco de Quito's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Universidad San Francisco de Quito · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador at the time of their publication.

About Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador have published 5.5k papers, which have received a total of 54.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 267 papers in Ecological Modeling, 189 papers in Computer Science Applications, 282 papers in Law, 499 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and 752 papers in Education on the topics of Business, Innovation, and Economy (502 papers), Educational Innovations and Technology (396 papers), Amphibian and Reptile Biology (283 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (267 papers), Education and Teacher Training (264 papers), Plant and animal studies (242 papers), Social Issues and Policies in Latin America (215 papers) and Diverse Applied Research Studies (190 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ecological Modeling (6.8k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (10.0k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (10.8k citations), Global and Planetary Change (8.9k citations) and Ecology (9.0k citations). Authors at Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador collaborate with scholars in Ecuador, United States and Spain and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, Zootaxa, ZooKeys, Biotropica and Symmetry. Some of Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador's most productive authors include Renato Valencia, Santiago R. Ron, Olivier Dangles, Dean Jacobsen, Luis A. Coloma, Eugenia M. del Pino, Nathan J. B. Kraft, Mario J. Grijalva, David D. Ackerly and Marcos Serrano‐Dueñas.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact