Plasma Technology (United States)
Impact in
-
- Magnetic confinement fusion research
- Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 2%
- Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Papers in
-
- Magnetic confinement fusion research 2.2k
- Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics 765
-
- Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics 1.0k
- Top scholars
- I. H. HutchinsonRichard J. TemkinB. LaBombardM. GreenwaldAnnemie BogaertsB. LipschultzPeter J. CattoRonald C. Davidson
- Journals
- Physics of Plasmas (481 papers)Nuclear Fusion (390 papers)Review of Scientific Instruments (337 papers)Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion (204 papers)Physical Review Letters (179 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Plasma Technology (United States)
4.3k papers receiving 93.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 229
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 48.6k
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 24.8k
- Aerospace Engineering 16.9k
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 20.0k
- Materials Chemistry 24.6k
Countries citing scholars working at Plasma Technology (United States)
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Plasma Technology (United States). It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Plasma Technology (United States) with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Plasma Technology (United States) more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Plasma Technology (United States)
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Plasma Technology (United States) at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Plasma Technology (United States) at the time of their publication.
About Plasma Technology (United States)
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Plasma Technology (United States) have published 4.6k papers, which have received a total of 94.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 2.5k papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 1.1k papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 1.1k papers in Aerospace Engineering, 1.0k papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 205 papers in Radiation on the topics of Magnetic confinement fusion research (2.2k papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (1.0k papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (893 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (765 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (730 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (708 papers), Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (522 papers) and Gyrotron and Vacuum Electronics Research (453 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Nuclear and High Energy Physics (48.6k citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (24.8k citations), Aerospace Engineering (16.9k citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (20.0k citations) and Materials Chemistry (24.6k citations). Authors at Plasma Technology (United States) collaborate with scholars in United States, Germany and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Physics of Plasmas, Nuclear Fusion, Review of Scientific Instruments, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion and Physical Review Letters. Some of Plasma Technology (United States)'s most productive authors include I. H. Hutchinson, Richard J. Temkin, B. LaBombard, M. Greenwald, Annemie Bogaerts, B. Lipschultz, Peter J. Catto, Ronald C. Davidson, J. P. Freidberg and L. Bromberg.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.