Peter J. Catto

5.2k citations
231 papers · 4.1k · h-index 35

Impact in

Papers in

Peter J. Catto

225 papers receiving 3.9k citations

Peers

Peter J. Catto
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 3.8k
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 2.8k
  • Aerospace Engineering 505
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 558
  • Materials Chemistry 798
Replace J. Weiland with:
J. Weiland Sweden
A. J. Wootton United States
D. J. Sigmar United States
J. P. Freidberg United States
E. Mazzucato United States
R. D. Hazeltine United States
F. L. Hinton United States
J. D. Callen United States
Francesco Porcelli Italy
W. M. Nevins United States
Peter J. Catto relative to J. Weiland Sweden J. Weiland's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
J. Weiland · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter J. Catto

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter J. Catto's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter J. Catto with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter J. Catto more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter J. Catto

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter J. Catto. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter J. Catto. The network helps show where Peter J. Catto may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter J. Catto, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter J. Catto Line = papers co-authored together Peter J. Catto links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 231 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1981214
2 1973150
3 1978140
4 1978139
5 2009127
6 2004119
7 198793
8 200385
9 200183
10 200879
11 199772
12 197767
13 197757
14 199456
15 200356
16 200653
17 199251
18 198149
19 199048
20 201248

About Peter J. Catto

Peter J. Catto is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Materials Chemistry, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Aerospace Engineering, having authored 231 papers that have together received 4.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic confinement fusion research (191 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (128 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (60 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (57 papers), Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (36 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (18 papers), Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (18 papers) and Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (17 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (3.8k citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (2.8k citations), Aerospace Engineering (505 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (558 citations) and Materials Chemistry (798 citations). Peter J. Catto has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Andrei N. Simakov, F. I. Parra, R. D. Hazeltine, K. T. Tsang, J. R. Myra, S. I. Krasheninnikov, M. N. Rosenbluth, W. M. Tang, P. Helander and Yong Xiao. Their work appears in journals such as Physics of Plasmas, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, Journal of Plasma Physics, Physical Review Letters and Nuclear Fusion.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact