Physiologie de la Reproduction et des Comportements
2.9k papers
receiving
88.9k citations
Peers
Physiologie de la Reproduction et des Comportements
Comparison fields: 5 of 225
Reproductive Medicine22.9k
Agronomy and Crop Science15.6k
Equine1.6k
Endocrine and Autonomic Systems3.8k
Aging1k
Replace Babraham Institute with:
Babraham InstituteUnited Kingdom
Zoological Society of LondonUnited Kingdom
European Bioinformatics InstituteUnited Kingdom
Centre for Human GeneticsUnited Kingdom
SIB Swiss Institute of BioinformaticsSwitzerland
Roslin InstituteUnited Kingdom
Vlaams Instituut voor BiotechnologieBelgium
Institut de génétique et de biologie moléculaire et cellulaireFrance
MRC Centre for Reproductive HealthUnited Kingdom
Organon (Netherlands)Netherlands
Physiologie de la Reproduction et des Comportementsrelative toBabraham InstituteUnited KingdomBabraham Institute's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.8×
Babraham Institute · 1×
×1.623k/14kRM
×2.616k/6kACS
×4.82k/339EQUIN
×1.44k/3kEAS
×0.41k/3kAGING
Citations per year
'16
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24
'25
'26
Countries citing scholars working at Physiologie de la Reproduction et des Comportements
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Physiologie de la Reproduction et des Comportements. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Physiologie de la Reproduction et des Comportements with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Physiologie de la Reproduction et des Comportements more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Physiologie de la Reproduction et des Comportements
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Physiologie de la Reproduction et des Comportements at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Physiologie de la Reproduction et des Comportements at the time of their publication.
About Physiologie de la Reproduction et des Comportements
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Physiologie de la Reproduction et des Comportements have published 3k papers, which have received a total of 89k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 812 papers in Reproductive Medicine, 674 papers in Agronomy and Crop Science, 97 papers in Equine, 262 papers in Small Animals and 121 papers in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems on the topics of Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (659 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (408 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (398 papers), Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones (365 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (240 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (105 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (103 papers) and Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (101 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Reproductive Medicine (22.9k citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (15.6k citations), Equine (1.6k citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (3.8k citations) and Aging (1k citations). Authors at Physiologie de la Reproduction et des Comportements collaborate with scholars in France, United Kingdom and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Theriogenology, Reproduction, Biology of Reproduction, Animal Reproduction Science and PLoS ONE. Some of Physiologie de la Reproduction et des Comportements's most productive authors include Joëlle Dupont, Pascal Mermillod, Philippe Monget, Frédéric Lévy, Benoît Malpaux, Raymond Nowak, Philippe Chemineau, Alain Caraty, Benoı̂st Schaal and Danielle Monniaux.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact