Zoological Society of London
Impact in
- Ecological Modeling top 0.5%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change
- Ecology top 1%
- Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Papers in
-
- Species Distribution and Climate Change 662
- Ecology 2.2k
- Wildlife Ecology and Conservation 1.2k
- Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies 276
- Top scholars
- Jinliang WangGeorgina M. MaceAndrew A. CunninghamPeter DaszakTim M. BlackburnGuy CowlishawKate E. JonesJohn L. Gittleman
- Journals
- Journal of Zoology (136 papers)Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (120 papers)Reproduction (106 papers)Conservation Biology (103 papers)PLoS ONE (103 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Zoological Society of London
4.6k papers receiving 237.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 242
- Ecological Modeling 32.3k
- Ecology 101.8k
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 42.5k
- Developmental Biology 6.1k
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 49.5k
Countries citing scholars working at Zoological Society of London
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Zoological Society of London. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Zoological Society of London with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Zoological Society of London more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Zoological Society of London
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Zoological Society of London at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Zoological Society of London at the time of their publication.
About Zoological Society of London
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Zoological Society of London have published 4.9k papers, which have received a total of 245.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 662 papers in Ecological Modeling, 2.2k papers in Ecology, 804 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 125 papers in Developmental Biology and 892 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics on the topics of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (1.2k papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (662 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (416 papers), Amphibian and Reptile Biology (374 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (348 papers), Primate Behavior and Ecology (342 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (305 papers) and Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (276 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ecological Modeling (32.3k citations), Ecology (101.8k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (42.5k citations), Developmental Biology (6.1k citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (49.5k citations). Authors at Zoological Society of London collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and Australia and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Zoology, Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, Reproduction, Conservation Biology and PLoS ONE. Some of Zoological Society of London's most productive authors include Jinliang Wang, Georgina M. Mace, Andrew A. Cunningham, Peter Daszak, Tim M. Blackburn, Guy Cowlishaw, Kate E. Jones, John L. Gittleman, J. Marcus Rowcliffe and Chris Carbone.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.