Idaho Department of Fish and Game

23.4k citations
1.1k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Idaho Department of Fish and Game

1.0k papers receiving 22.9k citations

Peers

Idaho Department of Fish and Game
Comparison fields: 5 of 195
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 10.6k
  • Aquatic Science 4.0k
  • Ecology 13.6k
  • Ecological Modeling 1.9k
  • Physiology 1.1k
Replace Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks with:
Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks United States
Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife United States
Seagen (United States) United States
Eastern Oregon University United States
Ministry of Environment Canada
Moss Landing Marine Laboratories United States
Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center United States
Colorado Parks and Wildlife United States
Zoological Society of San Diego United States
Ocean Institute United States
Idaho Department of Fish and Game relative to Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks United States Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Idaho Department of Fish and Game

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Idaho Department of Fish and Game. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Idaho Department of Fish and Game with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Idaho Department of Fish and Game more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Idaho Department of Fish and Game

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Idaho Department of Fish and Game at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Idaho Department of Fish and Game at the time of their publication.

About Idaho Department of Fish and Game

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Idaho Department of Fish and Game have published 1.1k papers, which have received a total of 23.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 595 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 217 papers in Aquatic Science, 583 papers in Ecology, 79 papers in Ecological Modeling and 77 papers in Physiology on the topics of Fish Ecology and Management Studies (533 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (248 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (158 papers), Fish Biology and Ecology Studies (136 papers), Marine and fisheries research (118 papers), Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes (108 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (98 papers) and Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth (89 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Nature and Landscape Conservation (10.6k citations), Aquatic Science (4.0k citations), Ecology (13.6k citations), Ecological Modeling (1.9k citations) and Physiology (1.1k citations). Authors at Idaho Department of Fish and Game collaborate with scholars in United States, Canada and China and have published in prestigious journals including North American Journal of Fisheries Management, Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, Journal of Wildlife Management, Journal of Wildlife Diseases and Fisheries. Some of Idaho Department of Fish and Game's most productive authors include John W. Connelly, Michael E. Barnes, Kevin A. Meyer, Daniel J. Schill, Lisette P. Waits, Vaughn L. Paragamian, Kerry P. Reese, Peter Zager, E. Frances Cassirer and David E. Ausband.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact