Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine
Impact in
-
- Diet and metabolism studies
-
- Nutritional Studies and Diet
- Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
- Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Papers in
-
- Animal testing and alternatives 32
-
- Nutritional Studies and Diet 64
- Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling 28
- Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet 18
- Top scholars
- Neal D. BarnardJohn N. HathcockSusan LevinHana KahleováAndrew ShaoJonathan BalcombeVesanto MelinaWinston J. Craig
- Journals
- Nutrients (19 papers)Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology (18 papers)Nutrition Reviews (13 papers)European Journal of Nutrition (13 papers)American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (12 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine
503 papers receiving 18.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 224
- Physiology 4.7k
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 4.3k
- Nutrition and Dietetics 2.0k
- Ecology 3.2k
- Biochemistry 688
Countries citing scholars working at Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine at the time of their publication.
About Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine have published 641 papers, which have received a total of 21.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 36 papers in Small Animals, 123 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 104 papers in Physiology, 3 papers in Issues, ethics and legal aspects and 20 papers in Complementary and alternative medicine on the topics of Nutritional Studies and Diet (64 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (58 papers), Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact (47 papers), Animal testing and alternatives (32 papers), Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling (28 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (19 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (18 papers) and Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease (17 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Physiology (4.7k citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (4.3k citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (2.0k citations), Ecology (3.2k citations) and Biochemistry (688 citations). Authors at Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Nutrients, Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, Nutrition Reviews, European Journal of Nutrition and American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. Some of Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine's most productive authors include Neal D. Barnard, John N. Hathcock, Susan Levin, Hana Kahleová, Andrew Shao, Jonathan Balcombe, Vesanto Melina, Winston J. Craig, Chad B. Sandusky and P. Charukeshi Chandrasekera.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.