Open Society Foundations
Impact in
-
- Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
- Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Papers in
-
- Opioid Use Disorder Treatment 24
- Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues 24
-
- Higher Education Governance and Development 12
- Top scholars
- Charles BazermanDaniel WolfeDeanna GreenKathleen M. FoleyRobert P. SchwartzThomas I. PalleyFrank D. FerrisJan Stjernswärd
- Journals
- Journal of Pain and Symptom Management (20 papers)International Journal of Drug Policy (13 papers)The Lancet (13 papers)Tertiary Education and Management (5 papers)Drug and Alcohol Dependence (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomItaly
In The Last Decade
Open Society Foundations
326 papers receiving 8.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 205
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 2.2k
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 266
- Epidemiology 1.6k
- Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 228
- General Health Professions 982
Countries citing scholars working at Open Society Foundations
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Open Society Foundations. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Open Society Foundations with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Open Society Foundations more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Open Society Foundations
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Open Society Foundations at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Open Society Foundations at the time of their publication.
About Open Society Foundations
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Open Society Foundations have published 402 papers, which have received a total of 10.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 59 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 52 papers in Political Science and International Relations, 59 papers in Epidemiology, 32 papers in Infectious Diseases and 80 papers in Sociology and Political Science on the topics of HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (42 papers), Software-Defined Networks and 5G (25 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (25 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (24 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (24 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (17 papers), Sex work and related issues (15 papers) and Higher Education Governance and Development (12 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (2.2k citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (266 citations), Epidemiology (1.6k citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (228 citations) and General Health Professions (982 citations). Authors at Open Society Foundations collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Italy and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, International Journal of Drug Policy, The Lancet, Tertiary Education and Management and Drug and Alcohol Dependence. Some of Open Society Foundations's most productive authors include Charles Bazerman, Daniel Wolfe, Deanna Green, Kathleen M. Foley, Robert P. Schwartz, Thomas I. Palley, Frank D. Ferris, Jan Stjernswärd, Timothy W. Kinlock and Patrizia Carrieri.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.