Norwegian Institute of International Affairs
Impact in
- General Energy top 0.5%
- Global Energy Security and Policy
- Development top 2%
- International Development and Aid
Papers in
-
- Global Energy Security and Policy 69
- Development 89
- International Development and Aid 89
- Top scholars
- İver B. NeumannJan FagerbergIndra ØverlandFulvio CastellacciIlan KelmanJohn KarlsrudOle Jacob SendingCedric de Coning
- Journals
- Cooperation and Conflict (20 papers)Forum for Development Studies (18 papers)Energy Research & Social Science (17 papers)European Security (16 papers)International Peacekeeping (15 papers)
- Partner nations
- NorwayUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Norwegian Institute of International Affairs
866 papers receiving 20.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 206
- General Energy 1.0k
- Development 1.7k
- Political Science and International Relations 7.3k
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1.8k
- Economics and Econometrics 5.1k
Countries citing scholars working at Norwegian Institute of International Affairs
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Norwegian Institute of International Affairs. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Norwegian Institute of International Affairs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Norwegian Institute of International Affairs more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Norwegian Institute of International Affairs
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Norwegian Institute of International Affairs at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Norwegian Institute of International Affairs at the time of their publication.
About Norwegian Institute of International Affairs
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Norwegian Institute of International Affairs have published 1.1k papers, which have received a total of 22.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 69 papers in General Energy, 89 papers in Development, 514 papers in Political Science and International Relations, 469 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 86 papers in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance on the topics of Peacebuilding and International Security (164 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (136 papers), International Relations and Foreign Policy (107 papers), International Development and Aid (89 papers), European Union Policy and Governance (85 papers), Political Conflict and Governance (84 papers), Global Energy Security and Policy (69 papers) and Arctic and Russian Policy Studies (65 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on General Energy (1.0k citations), Development (1.7k citations), Political Science and International Relations (7.3k citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (1.8k citations) and Economics and Econometrics (5.1k citations). Authors at Norwegian Institute of International Affairs collaborate with scholars in Norway, United Kingdom and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Cooperation and Conflict, Forum for Development Studies, Energy Research & Social Science, European Security and International Peacekeeping. Some of Norwegian Institute of International Affairs's most productive authors include İver B. Neumann, Jan Fagerberg, Indra Øverland, Fulvio Castellacci, Ilan Kelman, John Karlsrud, Ole Jacob Sending, Cedric de Coning, Roman Vakulchuk and Per Botolf Maurseth.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.