National Research Institute of Fire and Disaster
Impact in
-
- Fire dynamics and safety research
- Fire Detection and Safety Systems
-
- Fire effects on ecosystems
Papers in
-
- Fire dynamics and safety research 196
- Fire Detection and Safety Systems 62
-
- Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics 104
- Top scholars
- Hiroshi KosekiSamuel L. ManzelloSayaka SuzukiKen HatayamaTokiyoshi YamadaToshio HattoriYusaku IwataXinrui Li
- Journals
- Fire Safety Journal (32 papers)Fire Technology (25 papers)Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries (22 papers)Fire and Materials (16 papers)Combustion and Flame (11 papers)
- Partner nations
- JapanUnited StatesSouth Korea
In The Last Decade
National Research Institute of Fire and Disaster
558 papers receiving 8.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 210
- Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 3.0k
- Global and Planetary Change 1.5k
- Ocean Engineering 1.1k
- Aerospace Engineering 1.6k
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 361
Countries citing scholars working at National Research Institute of Fire and Disaster
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Research Institute of Fire and Disaster. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Research Institute of Fire and Disaster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Research Institute of Fire and Disaster more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at National Research Institute of Fire and Disaster
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Research Institute of Fire and Disaster at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Research Institute of Fire and Disaster at the time of their publication.
About National Research Institute of Fire and Disaster
In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Research Institute of Fire and Disaster have published 635 papers, which have received a total of 8.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 220 papers in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, 121 papers in Ocean Engineering, 37 papers in Safety Research, 95 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 102 papers in Aerospace Engineering on the topics of Fire dynamics and safety research (196 papers), Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics (104 papers), Combustion and Detonation Processes (81 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (80 papers), Fire Detection and Safety Systems (62 papers), Combustion and flame dynamics (37 papers), Education, Safety, and Science Studies (33 papers) and Thermal and Kinetic Analysis (31 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (3.0k citations), Global and Planetary Change (1.5k citations), Ocean Engineering (1.1k citations), Aerospace Engineering (1.6k citations) and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (361 citations). Authors at National Research Institute of Fire and Disaster collaborate with scholars in Japan, United States and South Korea and have published in prestigious journals including Fire Safety Journal, Fire Technology, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, Fire and Materials and Combustion and Flame. Some of National Research Institute of Fire and Disaster's most productive authors include Hiroshi Koseki, Samuel L. Manzello, Sayaka Suzuki, Ken Hatayama, Tokiyoshi Yamada, Toshio Hattori, Yusaku Iwata, Xinrui Li, Yuko Saso and Alexander B. Morgan.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.