NSF NOIRLab
Impact in
- Instrumentation top 5%
- Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 5%
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
- Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
- Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
- Astro and Planetary Science
Papers in
- Instrumentation 184
- Astronomy and Astrophysical Research 183
-
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies 282
- Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies 165
- Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena 161
- Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae 124
- Astro and Planetary Science 78
- Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations 68
- Top scholars
- Andrew E. DolphinTod R. LauerMark DickinsonEmma R. BeasorJoan NajitaBen DaviesTodd A. BorosonArjun Dey
- Journals
- The Astrophysical Journal (137 papers)Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (93 papers)The Astronomical Journal (52 papers)The Astrophysical Journal Letters (31 papers)Astronomy and Astrophysics (23 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomFrance
In The Last Decade
NSF NOIRLab
446 papers receiving 7.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
- Instrumentation 2.5k
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 6.7k
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 969
- Spectroscopy 254
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 409
Countries citing scholars working at NSF NOIRLab
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at NSF NOIRLab. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at NSF NOIRLab with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites NSF NOIRLab more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at NSF NOIRLab
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with NSF NOIRLab at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with NSF NOIRLab at the time of their publication.
About NSF NOIRLab
In recent decades, authors affiliated with NSF NOIRLab have published 504 papers, which have received a total of 7.6k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 184 papers in Instrumentation, 446 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 39 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 21 papers in Spectroscopy and 36 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics on the topics of Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (282 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (183 papers), Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (165 papers), Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (161 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (124 papers), Astro and Planetary Science (78 papers), Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (68 papers) and Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena (32 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Instrumentation (2.5k citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (6.7k citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (969 citations), Spectroscopy (254 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (409 citations). Authors at NSF NOIRLab collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and France and have published in prestigious journals including The Astrophysical Journal, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, The Astronomical Journal, The Astrophysical Journal Letters and Astronomy and Astrophysics. Some of NSF NOIRLab's most productive authors include Andrew E. Dolphin, Tod R. Lauer, Mark Dickinson, Emma R. Beasor, Joan Najita, Ben Davies, Todd A. Boroson, Arjun Dey, Chien‐Hsiu Lee and S. M. Faber.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.