Institute for Biological Sciences

2.8k papers receiving 102.1k citations

Peers

Institute for Biological Sciences
Comparison fields: 5 of 220
  • Endocrinology 5.8k
  • Microbiology 5.8k
  • Molecular Biology 51.0k
  • Molecular Medicine 3.0k
  • Immunology 11.6k
Replace Biotechnology Research Institute with:
Biotechnology Research Institute Canada
New England Biolabs (United States) United States
Centre hospitalier de l'Université Laval Canada
Cancer Research Institute United States
New York Genome Center United States
Molecular Oncology (United States) United States
Translational Therapeutics (United States) United States
Boston Biomedical Research Institute United States
National Foundation for Cancer Research United States
Biogen (United States) United States
Institute for Biological Sciences relative to Biotechnology Research Institute Canada Biotechnology Research Institute's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.2×
Biotechnology Research Institute · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Institute for Biological Sciences

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Institute for Biological Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Institute for Biological Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Institute for Biological Sciences more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Institute for Biological Sciences

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Institute for Biological Sciences at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Institute for Biological Sciences at the time of their publication.

About Institute for Biological Sciences

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Institute for Biological Sciences have published 2.9k papers, which have received a total of 106.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 154 papers in Endocrinology, 164 papers in Microbiology, 1.4k papers in Molecular Biology, 263 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and 283 papers in Immunology on the topics of Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (452 papers), Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis (326 papers), Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (154 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (142 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (138 papers), Escherichia coli research studies (115 papers), Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (101 papers) and Immune Response and Inflammation (82 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Endocrinology (5.8k citations), Microbiology (5.8k citations), Molecular Biology (51.0k citations), Molecular Medicine (3.0k citations) and Immunology (11.6k citations). Authors at Institute for Biological Sciences collaborate with scholars in Canada, United States and Serbia and have published in prestigious journals including Carbohydrate Research, Journal of Biological Chemistry, Infection and Immunity, Biochemistry and European Journal of Biochemistry. Some of Institute for Biological Sciences's most productive authors include Danica Stanimirovic, Evgeny Vinogradov, Malcolm B. Perry, Jianjun Li, Warren W. Wakarchuk, Jean‐Robert Brisson, Susan M. Logan, Paul Morley, Pierre Thibault and John F. Kelly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact