Cornell Lab of Ornithology

97.4k citations
2.3k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Cornell Lab of Ornithology

2.2k papers receiving 97.4k citations

Peers

Cornell Lab of Ornithology
Comparison fields: 5 of 224
  • Developmental Biology 8.7k
  • Ecological Modeling 6.4k
  • Ecology 39k
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 13.8k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 6.8k
Replace National Zoological Park with:
National Zoological Park United States
National Park Service United States
Wildlife Conservation Society United States
Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute United States
SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry United States
Conservation International United States
World Wildlife Fund United States
The Nature Conservancy United States
Royal Ontario Museum Canada
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service United States
Cornell Lab of Ornithology relative to National Zoological Park United States National Zoological Park's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.1×
National Zoological Park · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Cornell Lab of Ornithology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Cornell Lab of Ornithology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Cornell Lab of Ornithology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cornell Lab of Ornithology more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Cornell Lab of Ornithology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Cornell Lab of Ornithology at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Cornell Lab of Ornithology at the time of their publication.

About Cornell Lab of Ornithology

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Cornell Lab of Ornithology have published 2.3k papers, which have received a total of 97.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 281 papers in Developmental Biology, 132 papers in Ecological Modeling, 1.2k papers in Ecology, 408 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and 71 papers in Parasitology on the topics of Avian ecology and behavior (780 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (357 papers), Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior (281 papers), Marine animal studies overview (226 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (191 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (143 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (132 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (79 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Developmental Biology (8.7k citations), Ecological Modeling (6.4k citations), Ecology (39k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (13.8k citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (6.8k citations). Authors at Cornell Lab of Ornithology collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including The Auk, Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, Ornithological Applications, PLoS ONE and Animal Behaviour. Some of Cornell Lab of Ornithology's most productive authors include Irby J. Lovette, Daniel L. Rabosky, Rick E. Bonney, Wesley M. Hochachka, André A. Dhondt, Christopher W. Clark, David N. Bonter, Janis L. Dickinson, Daniel Fink and Tina Phillips.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact