National Postdoctoral Association
Impact in
- Developmental Neuroscience top 5%
- Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research
-
- Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
Papers in
-
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies 66
- Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena 63
- Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies 56
- Top scholars
- Barry D. OlafsonRobert E. BruccoleriMartin KarplusDavid J. StatesBernard R. BrooksS. SwaminathanTed BelytschkoTimon Rabczuk
- Journals
- Anesthesiology (369 papers)The Astrophysical Journal (87 papers)Helvetica Chimica Acta (53 papers)International Journal of Chemical Kinetics (52 papers)Soil Science Society of America Journal (40 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
National Postdoctoral Association
2.5k papers receiving 99.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 250
- Developmental Neuroscience 3.8k
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 3.9k
- Instrumentation 1.8k
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 2.1k
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 7.2k
Countries citing scholars working at National Postdoctoral Association
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Postdoctoral Association. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Postdoctoral Association with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Postdoctoral Association more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at National Postdoctoral Association
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Postdoctoral Association at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Postdoctoral Association at the time of their publication.
About National Postdoctoral Association
In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Postdoctoral Association have published 2.8k papers, which have received a total of 110.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 173 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 34 papers in Instrumentation, 45 papers in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, 35 papers in Developmental Neuroscience and 9 papers in General Psychology on the topics of Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (66 papers), Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (63 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (57 papers), Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (56 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (47 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (45 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (40 papers) and Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (36 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Developmental Neuroscience (3.8k citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (3.9k citations), Instrumentation (1.8k citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (2.1k citations) and Astronomy and Astrophysics (7.2k citations). Authors at National Postdoctoral Association collaborate with scholars in United States, Canada and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Anesthesiology, The Astrophysical Journal, Helvetica Chimica Acta, International Journal of Chemical Kinetics and Soil Science Society of America Journal. Some of National Postdoctoral Association's most productive authors include Barry D. Olafson, Robert E. Bruccoleri, Martin Karplus, David J. States, Bernard R. Brooks, S. Swaminathan, Ted Belytschko, Timon Rabczuk, Harold Basch and Walter J. Stevens.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.