King's College - North Carolina

182.5k citations
5.6k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

King's College - North Carolina

4.6k papers receiving 153.9k citations

Peers

King's College - North Carolina
Comparison fields: 5 of 250
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 11.8k
  • Hepatology 6.0k
  • Biological Psychiatry 1.5k
  • Clinical Psychology 12.3k
  • Neurology 7.6k
Replace University of North Carolina at Charlotte with:
University of North Carolina at Charlotte United States
East Carolina University United States
Catholic University of America United States
University of Baltimore United States
Ohio University United States
Howard University United States
George Mason University United States
Wright State University United States
East Tennessee State University United States
Heidelberg University United States
King's College - North Carolina relative to University of North Carolina at Charlotte United States University of North Carolina at Charlotte's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
University of North Carolina at Charlotte · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at King's College - North Carolina

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at King's College - North Carolina. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at King's College - North Carolina with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites King's College - North Carolina more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at King's College - North Carolina

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with King's College - North Carolina at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with King's College - North Carolina at the time of their publication.

About King's College - North Carolina

In recent decades, authors affiliated with King's College - North Carolina have published 5.6k papers, which have received a total of 182.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 160 papers in Hepatology, 266 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health, 314 papers in Clinical Psychology, 94 papers in Oral Surgery and 55 papers in Orthodontics on the topics of Liver Disease and Transplantation (90 papers), Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (75 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (74 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (58 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (57 papers), Neurological disorders and treatments (51 papers), Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes (50 papers) and Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (49 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Psychiatry and Mental health (11.8k citations), Hepatology (6.0k citations), Biological Psychiatry (1.5k citations), Clinical Psychology (12.3k citations) and Neurology (7.6k citations). Authors at King's College - North Carolina collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including BDJ, The Lancet, Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, The Journal of Immunology and Neurology. Some of King's College - North Carolina's most productive authors include Martin Guha, C. D. Marsden, Avshalom Caspi, Andrew B. Holmes, Piers R. J. Gaffney, Colin B. Reese, Francesca Happé, Julia Wendon, К. Ray Chaudhuri and R.G. Gosling.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact