Naval Ordnance Laboratory

38.6k citations
1.4k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Naval Ordnance Laboratory

1.3k papers receiving 38.5k citations

Peers

Naval Ordnance Laboratory
Comparison fields: 5 of 176
  • Condensed Matter Physics 4.4k
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 5.9k
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 8.4k
  • Materials Chemistry 9k
  • Mechanics of Materials 3.5k
Replace Franklin Institute with:
Franklin Institute United States
Xerox (United States) United States
Naval Research Laboratory Chemistry Division
United States Army Research Office United States
Allied Corporation (United States)
Material Measurement Laboratory United States
Naval Research Laboratory Materials Science and Technology Division
United Technologies (United States) United States
Cornell High Energy Synchrotron Source
Avco (United States)
Naval Ordnance Laboratory relative to Franklin Institute United States Franklin Institute's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.1×
Franklin Institute · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Naval Ordnance Laboratory

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Naval Ordnance Laboratory. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Naval Ordnance Laboratory with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Naval Ordnance Laboratory more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Naval Ordnance Laboratory

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Naval Ordnance Laboratory at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Naval Ordnance Laboratory at the time of their publication.

About Naval Ordnance Laboratory

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Naval Ordnance Laboratory have published 1.4k papers, which have received a total of 38.6k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 204 papers in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, 144 papers in Condensed Matter Physics, 274 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 163 papers in Computational Mechanics and 258 papers in Materials Chemistry on the topics of Semiconductor materials and interfaces (106 papers), Magnetic Properties and Applications (97 papers), Advanced Semiconductor Detectors and Materials (95 papers), Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics (82 papers), Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (78 papers), Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials (64 papers), Energetic Materials and Combustion (63 papers) and Gas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory (62 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Condensed Matter Physics (4.4k citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (5.9k citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (8.4k citations), Materials Chemistry (9k citations) and Mechanics of Materials (3.5k citations). Authors at Naval Ordnance Laboratory collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Japan and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Applied Physics, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, The Journal of Chemical Physics, AIAA Journal and Review of Scientific Instruments. Some of Naval Ordnance Laboratory's most productive authors include Richard L. Petritz, Mortimer J. Kamlet, Robert S. Allgaier, Stanley J. Pickart, Daniel Shanks, Richard A. Ferrell, Earl Callen, Sigmund J. Jacobs, Wayne W. Scanlon and William J. Buehler.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact