Franklin Institute

67.9k citations
1.8k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

    • Nuclear Physics and Applications 97
    • X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis 82
    • Nuclear physics research studies 146
    • Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena 54

Franklin Institute

1.7k papers receiving 60.0k citations

Peers

Franklin Institute
Comparison fields: 5 of 243
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 7.0k
  • Hematology 5.0k
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 2.8k
  • Radiation 3.2k
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 9.3k
Replace National Postdoctoral Association with:
National Postdoctoral Association United States
Office of Naval Research United States
PerkinElmer (United States) United States
Science Research Laboratory United States
Rice Institute United States
Bruker (United States) United States
Hampton University United States
Canadian Nautical Research Society Canada
Pratt Institute United States
Harvard College Observatory United States
Franklin Institute relative to National Postdoctoral Association United States National Postdoctoral Association's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×16.1×
National Postdoctoral Association · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Franklin Institute

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Franklin Institute. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Franklin Institute with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Franklin Institute more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Franklin Institute

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Franklin Institute at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Franklin Institute at the time of their publication.

About Franklin Institute

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Franklin Institute have published 1.8k papers, which have received a total of 67.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 194 papers in Radiation, 249 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 161 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 280 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 88 papers in Condensed Matter Physics on the topics of Nuclear physics research studies (146 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (97 papers), Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (96 papers), X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis (82 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (76 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (70 papers), Tribology and Lubrication Engineering (55 papers) and Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (54 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Nuclear and High Energy Physics (7.0k citations), Hematology (5.0k citations), Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (2.8k citations), Radiation (3.2k citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (9.3k citations). Authors at Franklin Institute collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of the Franklin Institute, Journal of Applied Physics, Physics Letters B, Nuclear Physics A and Nature. Some of Franklin Institute's most productive authors include Janet D. Rowley, Prince E. Rouse, C.W. Hargens, S. Shtrikman, Zvi Hashin, F.J. Donahoe, Charles E. Metz, William C. Yager, Raymond L. Smith and Robert A. Baker.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact