National Museum of Natural History

7.0k citations
697 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

National Museum of Natural History

583 papers receiving 6.7k citations

Peers

National Museum of Natural History
Comparison fields: 5 of 167
  • Paleontology 2.0k
  • Ecological Modeling 792
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 2.1k
  • Ecology 2.5k
  • Developmental Biology 202
Replace Emil Racovita Institute of Speleology with:
Emil Racovita Institute of Speleology Romania
Institute of Systematics and Evolution of Animals Poland
Research Centre of the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts Slovenia
Croatian Academy of Sciences and Arts Croatia
Museo Civico di Zoologia Italy
Museo Galileo Italy
State Museum of Natural History of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine Ukraine
BioSense Institute Serbia
Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries Croatia
Institute of Paleobiology Poland
National Museum of Natural History relative to Emil Racovita Institute of Speleology Romania Emil Racovita Institute of Speleology's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×16.8×
Emil Racovita Institute of Speleology · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at National Museum of Natural History

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Museum of Natural History. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Museum of Natural History with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Museum of Natural History more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at National Museum of Natural History

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Museum of Natural History at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Museum of Natural History at the time of their publication.

About National Museum of Natural History

In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Museum of Natural History have published 697 papers, which have received a total of 7.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 185 papers in Paleontology, 75 papers in Ecological Modeling, 268 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 209 papers in Ecology and 186 papers in Genetics on the topics of Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy (90 papers), Evolution and Paleontology Studies (79 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (75 papers), Spider Taxonomy and Behavior Studies (62 papers), Bat Biology and Ecology Studies (60 papers), Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (52 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (51 papers) and Marine and environmental studies (49 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Paleontology (2.0k citations), Ecological Modeling (792 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (2.1k citations), Ecology (2.5k citations) and Developmental Biology (202 citations). Authors at National Museum of Natural History collaborate with scholars in Bulgaria, United States and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including ZooKeys, Zootaxa, Copeia, Ecologica Montenegrina and Journal of Human Evolution. Some of National Museum of Natural History's most productive authors include Nikolaï Spassov, Denis Geraads, Павел Стоев, Andrea Cardini, Zlatozar Nikolaev Boev, Mariana V. Filipova-Marinova, Nikolay Tzankov, Richard P. Vari, Björn M. Siemers and Teodora Ivanova.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact