National Museum of Natural History
Impact in
- Paleontology top 0.1%
- Evolution and Paleontology Studies
- Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
- Ecological Modeling top 0.5%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change
Papers in
- Paleontology 2.5k
- Evolution and Paleontology Studies 1.1k
-
- Plant and animal studies 1.5k
- Plant Diversity and Evolution 805
- Top scholars
- Kevin de QueirozJonathan A. CoddingtonDouglas H. ErwinMelinda A. ZederConrad C. LabandeiraBruce D. SmithW. John KressScott L. Wing
- Journals
- Zootaxa (555 papers)ZooKeys (324 papers)Science (231 papers)PLoS ONE (222 papers)Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution (214 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomChina
In The Last Decade
National Museum of Natural History
10.9k papers receiving 416.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 244
- Paleontology 89.8k
- Ecological Modeling 24.5k
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 103.2k
- Ecology 126.7k
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 56.1k
Countries citing scholars working at National Museum of Natural History
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Museum of Natural History. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Museum of Natural History with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Museum of Natural History more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at National Museum of Natural History
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Museum of Natural History at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Museum of Natural History at the time of their publication.
About National Museum of Natural History
In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Museum of Natural History have published 11.7k papers, which have received a total of 430.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 2.5k papers in Paleontology, 3.9k papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 675 papers in Ecological Modeling, 3.5k papers in Ecology and 1.6k papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation on the topics of Plant and animal studies (1.5k papers), Evolution and Paleontology Studies (1.1k papers), Marine Biology and Ecology Research (976 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (805 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (740 papers), Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies (738 papers), Ichthyology and Marine Biology (723 papers) and Genetic diversity and population structure (699 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Paleontology (89.8k citations), Ecological Modeling (24.5k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (103.2k citations), Ecology (126.7k citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (56.1k citations). Authors at National Museum of Natural History collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and China and have published in prestigious journals including Zootaxa, ZooKeys, Science, PLoS ONE and Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. Some of National Museum of Natural History's most productive authors include Kevin de Queiroz, Jonathan A. Coddington, Douglas H. Erwin, Melinda A. Zeder, Conrad C. Labandeira, Bruce D. Smith, W. John Kress, Scott L. Wing, Robert K. Colwell and Richard Potts.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.