National Museum of Natural History
Impact in
- Paleontology top 0.1%
- Evolution and Paleontology Studies
- Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
- Ecological Modeling top 0.5%
Papers in
- Paleontology 2.4k
- Evolution and Paleontology Studies 1.1k
-
- Plant and animal studies 1.4k
- Plant Diversity and Evolution 781
- Top scholars
- Kevin de QueirozJonathan A. CoddingtonDouglas H. ErwinMelinda A. ZederConrad C. LabandeiraW. John KressBruce D. SmithScott L. Wing
- Journals
- Zootaxa (547 papers)ZooKeys (249 papers)PLoS ONE (222 papers)Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution (213 papers)Science (187 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomChina
In The Last Decade
National Museum of Natural History
10.5k papers receiving 393.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 243
- Paleontology 85.9k
- Ecological Modeling 22.6k
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 98.1k
- Ecology 121.2k
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 53.2k
Countries citing scholars working at National Museum of Natural History
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Museum of Natural History. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Museum of Natural History with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Museum of Natural History more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at National Museum of Natural History
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Museum of Natural History at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Museum of Natural History at the time of their publication.
About National Museum of Natural History
In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Museum of Natural History have published 11.3k papers, which have received a total of 405.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 2.4k papers in Paleontology, 3.8k papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 638 papers in Ecological Modeling, 3.4k papers in Ecology and 1.5k papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation on the topics of Plant and animal studies (1.4k papers), Evolution and Paleontology Studies (1.1k papers), Marine Biology and Ecology Research (964 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (781 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (732 papers), Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies (715 papers), Ichthyology and Marine Biology (710 papers) and Genetic diversity and population structure (682 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Paleontology (85.9k citations), Ecological Modeling (22.6k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (98.1k citations), Ecology (121.2k citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (53.2k citations). Authors at National Museum of Natural History collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and China and have published in prestigious journals including Zootaxa, ZooKeys, PLoS ONE, Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution and Science. Some of National Museum of Natural History's most productive authors include Kevin de Queiroz, Jonathan A. Coddington, Douglas H. Erwin, Melinda A. Zeder, Conrad C. Labandeira, W. John Kress, Bruce D. Smith, Scott L. Wing, Robert K. Colwell and Storrs L. Olson.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.