American Museum of Natural History
Impact in
- Paleontology top 0.02%
- Evolution and Paleontology Studies
- Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
- Ecological Modeling top 0.02%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change
Papers in
- Paleontology 4.1k
- Evolution and Paleontology Studies 2.6k
- Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology 1.4k
- Ecological Modeling 1.2k
- Species Distribution and Climate Change 1.2k
- Top scholars
- Robert P. AndersonA. Townsend PetersonWard C. WheelerSteven J. PhillipsRobert E. SchapireRichard O. PrumRob DeSalleRobert Douglas Holt
- Journals
- American Museum Novitates (657 papers)Zootaxa (428 papers)Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution (316 papers)Cladistics (292 papers)Nature (280 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomGermany
In The Last Decade
American Museum of Natural History
14.9k papers receiving 624.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 246
- Paleontology 149.6k
- Ecological Modeling 78.8k
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 124.6k
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 163.3k
- Ecology 167.6k
Countries citing scholars working at American Museum of Natural History
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at American Museum of Natural History. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at American Museum of Natural History with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites American Museum of Natural History more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at American Museum of Natural History
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with American Museum of Natural History at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with American Museum of Natural History at the time of their publication.
About American Museum of Natural History
In recent decades, authors affiliated with American Museum of Natural History have published 16.0k papers, which have received a total of 651.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 4.1k papers in Paleontology, 1.2k papers in Ecological Modeling, 4.8k papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 2.4k papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 3.9k papers in Ecology on the topics of Evolution and Paleontology Studies (2.6k papers), Plant and animal studies (1.8k papers), Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology (1.4k papers), Amphibian and Reptile Biology (1.3k papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (1.2k papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (1.2k papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (1.0k papers) and Ichthyology and Marine Biology (1.0k papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Paleontology (149.6k citations), Ecological Modeling (78.8k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (124.6k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (163.3k citations) and Ecology (167.6k citations). Authors at American Museum of Natural History collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including American Museum Novitates, Zootaxa, Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, Cladistics and Nature. Some of American Museum of Natural History's most productive authors include Robert P. Anderson, A. Townsend Peterson, Ward C. Wheeler, Steven J. Phillips, Robert E. Schapire, Richard O. Prum, Rob DeSalle, Robert Douglas Holt, Michael S. Engel and James S. Farris.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.