Natural and Medical Sciences Institute
Impact in
-
- Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
- Nerve injury and regeneration
-
- Advanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications
- Retinal Development and Disorders
Papers in
-
- Neuroscience and Neural Engineering 123
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research 27
- Top scholars
- Thomas O JoosBürkhard SchlosshauerKatja Schenke‐LaylandDieter StollMarkus F. TemplinAlfred StettRumen KrastevUlrich Rothbauer
- Journals
- Scientific Reports (22 papers)Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science (17 papers)PLoS ONE (17 papers)Nature Communications (15 papers)Archives of Toxicology (15 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Natural and Medical Sciences Institute
1.1k papers receiving 36.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 204
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 5k
- Molecular Biology 7.9k
- Biomedical Engineering 4.1k
- Biophysics 771
- Molecular Medicine 577
Countries citing scholars working at Natural and Medical Sciences Institute
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Natural and Medical Sciences Institute. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Natural and Medical Sciences Institute with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natural and Medical Sciences Institute more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Natural and Medical Sciences Institute
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Natural and Medical Sciences Institute at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Natural and Medical Sciences Institute at the time of their publication.
About Natural and Medical Sciences Institute
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Natural and Medical Sciences Institute have published 1.1k papers, which have received a total of 36.6k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 186 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, 16 papers in Structural Biology, 45 papers in Biophysics, 41 papers in Surfaces, Coatings and Films and 259 papers in Molecular Biology on the topics of Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (123 papers), Advanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications (68 papers), SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research (35 papers), Polymer Surface Interaction Studies (33 papers), Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications (32 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (30 papers), 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (30 papers) and Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (27 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (5k citations), Molecular Biology (7.9k citations), Biomedical Engineering (4.1k citations), Biophysics (771 citations) and Molecular Medicine (577 citations). Authors at Natural and Medical Sciences Institute collaborate with scholars in Germany, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Scientific Reports, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, PLoS ONE, Nature Communications and Archives of Toxicology. Some of Natural and Medical Sciences Institute's most productive authors include Thomas O Joos, Bürkhard Schlosshauer, Katja Schenke‐Layland, Dieter Stoll, Markus F. Templin, Alfred Stett, Rumen Krastev, Ulrich Rothbauer, W. Nisch and Oliver Poetz.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.