Ontario Forest Research Institute

25.6k citations
654 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Ontario Forest Research Institute

641 papers receiving 25.6k citations

Peers

Ontario Forest Research Institute
Comparison fields: 5 of 182
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 6.6k
  • Ecology 6.1k
  • Global and Planetary Change 5.1k
  • Insect Science 2k
  • Environmental Engineering 1.9k
Replace Algoma University with:
Algoma University Canada
Morton Arboretum United States
Chicago Botanic Garden
Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center
Lincoln Park Zoo United States
National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center United States
Cooperative Institute for Great Lakes Research United States
Gund Institute for Environment United States
National Institute for Mathematical and Biological Synthesis United States
Missouri Department of Conservation United States
Ontario Forest Research Institute relative to Algoma University Canada Algoma University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8.7×
Algoma University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Ontario Forest Research Institute

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Ontario Forest Research Institute. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Ontario Forest Research Institute with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ontario Forest Research Institute more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Ontario Forest Research Institute

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Ontario Forest Research Institute at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Ontario Forest Research Institute at the time of their publication.

About Ontario Forest Research Institute

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Ontario Forest Research Institute have published 654 papers, which have received a total of 25.6k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 271 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 164 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 143 papers in Ecology, 40 papers in Environmental Engineering and 31 papers in Insect Science on the topics of Forest ecology and management (173 papers), Seedling growth and survival studies (101 papers), Forest Management and Policy (89 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (62 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (52 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (41 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (30 papers) and Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology (28 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Nature and Landscape Conservation (6.6k citations), Ecology (6.1k citations), Global and Planetary Change (5.1k citations), Insect Science (2k citations) and Environmental Engineering (1.9k citations). Authors at Ontario Forest Research Institute collaborate with scholars in Canada, United States and China and have published in prestigious journals including The Forestry Chronicle, Forest Ecology and Management, Canadian Journal of Forest Research, New Forests and Forests. Some of Ontario Forest Research Institute's most productive authors include Crawford S. Holling, Changhui Peng, Michael T. Ter‐Mikaelian, Thomas L. Noland, Mahadev Sharma, Stephen John Colombo, Ajith H. Perera, Michael D. Korzukhin, John R. Miller and William C. Parker.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact