Netherlands Youth Institute
Impact in
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Child Abuse and Trauma
- Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
- Family and Disability Support Research
- Migration, Health and Trauma
- Safety Research top 10%
Papers in
-
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development 122
- Child Abuse and Trauma 53
- Family and Disability Support Research 26
- Top scholars
- Susan BranjePeter NikkenWim MeeusEva AlisicJeroen JanszKim SchildkampWilmad KuiperDian A. de Vries
- Journals
- Journal of Youth and Adolescence (24 papers)Journal of Adolescence (11 papers)Children and Youth Services Review (10 papers)European journal of psychotraumatology (8 papers)International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Netherlands Youth Institute
350 papers receiving 7.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 159
- Clinical Psychology 3.9k
- Safety Research 592
- Social Psychology 1.3k
- Applied Psychology 280
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 670
Countries citing scholars working at Netherlands Youth Institute
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Netherlands Youth Institute. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Netherlands Youth Institute with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Netherlands Youth Institute more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Netherlands Youth Institute
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Netherlands Youth Institute at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Netherlands Youth Institute at the time of their publication.
About Netherlands Youth Institute
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Netherlands Youth Institute have published 394 papers, which have received a total of 7.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 212 papers in Clinical Psychology, 55 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 83 papers in Social Psychology, 29 papers in Safety Research and 43 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology on the topics of Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (122 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (53 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (32 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (31 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (26 papers), Family Support in Illness (25 papers), Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (20 papers) and Child Welfare and Adoption (19 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Clinical Psychology (3.9k citations), Safety Research (592 citations), Social Psychology (1.3k citations), Applied Psychology (280 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (670 citations). Authors at Netherlands Youth Institute collaborate with scholars in Netherlands, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Youth and Adolescence, Journal of Adolescence, Children and Youth Services Review, European journal of psychotraumatology and International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. Some of Netherlands Youth Institute's most productive authors include Susan Branje, Peter Nikken, Wim Meeus, Eva Alisic, Jeroen Jansz, Kim Schildkamp, Wilmad Kuiper, Dian A. de Vries, Erik Wilde and Jochen Peter.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.